SSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agoHot off the presseslemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageHot off the presseslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoI’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.
I’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.