• fxomt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Where’s the code? There’s only 9 commits to the backend and its only scaffold code. There’s not even activitypub?

    Same with the app. Was this just a publicity stunt?

    • CMLVI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The Loops app certainly feels like it. Not to diminish a solo dev doing something on his own, but it just seems like a standard video player with like, comment, follow. Search feature is only by user; when you type a comment, it doesn’t wrap the text, it just moves horizontally until you post it. I think the feed is literally just a chronological list of every video posted, and for some reason, most of the videos I see on it are just like…atmospheric videos. Still camera, nature background, rain in someone’s backyard. People love the concept, but I don’t see how it’s anywhere near ready to compete for users like other options are right now.

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The web UI has been teased for so long, too. I’m losing trust with dan. I mean im glad he found success with pixelfed, and i wouldn’t even have a problem with how long it takes loops; but he’s just dishonest. If he was more honest, transparent and open sourced the code early on i would’ve had no problem. But this? what is this?

        • CMLVI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m not a big Fediverse proponent, like…the concept is good, if not still a little young (activity pub isn’t ironed out across mediums and is still a bit jank in my opinion) but it seems a bit like a cash grab to be the savior dev making all the X-equivalent of Fediverse, and just hopefully something sticks. With PixelFed blowing up, feel like Loops is gonna take a back seat for quite a while.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Pretty sure those are ai linked in bots that send that message to every single email they can scrape off the open web lmao.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If that quote is what was sent to him to entice him to sell that sounds strongly like a scam

  • m_f@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Looks like skeleton code to me? I don’t see how that could be what the site/app are running on

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Dan is constantly talking about buyout requests he’s receiving for Loops and Pixelfed, so much so that it makes me a bit suspicious of those claims. Nearly every other post I see from his Mastodon feed is bragging about another alleged buyout offer, and how he’s not for sale.

    Has he ever shown proof of any of these offers he’s received? It’s not that I want to doubt him, but he’s been very persistent with this claim and I think it’s fair to scrutinize it at this point.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It is a time of predatory billionaires grabbing all forms of media. It would not surprise me if he did get offers. It would also be very unprofessional to broadcast the valuation of Loops and Pixelfed while turning down the offer. It would be like recording and showing someone asking for a date and getting rejected.

    • m_f@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It wouldn’t surprise me at all. Pixelfed got mainstream notice, and there’s always someone willing to give you money. Pretty much every popular Firefox/Chrome addon developer gets emails about buying it, but those are usually just shady companies looking to push malware onto the existing install base.

      Even apart from those, it wouldn’t really surprise me to see some VC interest when Pixelfed hit #1 on the play store. They love the idea of glomming onto something that looks like a rocket and trying to ride it to the moon

    • Ze_Rosie_Ro@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      Pardon my ignorance, I am new to the fediverse and have no idea what I’m doing. But, when I signed up for loops on the website, I had to wait 3 days for them to send me a link to download a test-flight app for loops. I cannot recall if TestFlight is standard on iPhone or if I downloaded it previously.

    • psyspoop@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It wasn’t. He had previously said that he would open source it after it had become more stable, but there was a lot of skepticism that he would follow through.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    did he at least get a dollar value first?

    edit: I honestly would have pursued it as far as legally possible first just to know how much of a fuck you I was sending … can someone offer to buy Bluesky now?