The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 1 年前Which Animals Could You Beat in a Fight?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square193linkfedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down15
arrow-up1233arrow-down1imageWhich Animals Could You Beat in a Fight?lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square193linkfedilink
minus-squareglitch1985@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前It would be difficult to fight anything without arms. I guess you could just do roundhouse kicks but arms would be much more useful.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Thats why the brits have an advantage, all that.soccer helps their kick attacks. Americans obviously overrate themselves by what ever percent they think they can beat an elephant, bear, or gorrila.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·1 年前Correct, my whole point is it’s vague enough to take advantage of so it’s not actually indicative of much aside from malicious compliance.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前I feel like unarmed is not vague enough to allow for machine guns lol
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 年前“if you were unarmed” I’m unarmed, the fellas i hire may not be but that isn’t the question.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 年前You were super fun on the playground I’m sure
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 年前This isn’t the playground, I’m not sure your point. Ask an inane questions I’m going to give you absurdist but logical answers. That said, I haven’t met a single person who has said that who doesn’t themselves seem insufferable.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Oh boy. It was a joke.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Yeah i think we all get that as that’s what it usually is and I stand by my point.
It would be difficult to fight anything without arms. I guess you could just do roundhouse kicks but arms would be much more useful.
Thats why the brits have an advantage, all that.soccer helps their kick attacks.
Americans obviously overrate themselves by what ever percent they think they can beat an elephant, bear, or gorrila.
Correct, my whole point is it’s vague enough to take advantage of so it’s not actually indicative of much aside from malicious compliance.
I feel like unarmed is not vague enough to allow for machine guns lol
“if you were unarmed”
I’m unarmed, the fellas i hire may not be but that isn’t the question.
You were super fun on the playground I’m sure
This isn’t the playground, I’m not sure your point. Ask an inane questions I’m going to give you absurdist but logical answers.
That said, I haven’t met a single person who has said that who doesn’t themselves seem insufferable.
Oh boy. It was a joke.
Yeah i think we all get that as that’s what it usually is and I stand by my point.