• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 days ago

      Wow. You’re good at this.

      I’m going to use my wish to talk you into hiring me as your personal driver for like a year, so I can learn your wisdom.

      That’s so well played.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        Jokes on you, I’d probably enjoy that so I wouldn’t argue. Especially if I’m crazy rich, what else would I have to do?

  • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    My father, and the argument would be about his political views. Radicalized years ago but the taking heads on Fox.

    I miss my dad. 😔

    • stinky@redlemmy.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Gosh. I’m sorry. My dad passed five or six years ago. I hope you are able to connect with yours while you have time

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I argue that American Conservatives should all commit suicide with Trump on Truth Social.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Horseshoe theory in action here.

      Wishing death on 150+ million people because of their political beliefs doesn’t make you righteous. You’ve looped all the way around to becoming the exact thing you claim to oppose.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I don’t care who I’ll be arguing with, but the disagreement will center on the hour and manner of Trump’s inevitable demise.

    I’m thinking a trauma-induced stroke, caused when JD Vance has a sudden epileptic fit and bites off Donny Jr. in the Lincoln bedroom.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Maybe myself (as an experiment), or the genie about if I should get more wishes or something. Wasting universe-altering magic on convincing one person seems like a waste.

    Edit: To be more clear about the self argument:

    You can do a lot of funny stuff with logical constructs. If you say “exclusively, [wish] or this statement is false” it’s a paradox unless the wish is true. If I argue with someone else, them misunderstanding could count as a victory, but if I’m on both sides that’s a bit harder. It’s possible I just die or explode or something, but maybe it will actually work, too.

    You can get way more sophisticated with that, and probably should if you only get one shot. Godel’s incompleteness theorem is a famous example of that kind of tortured self-reference. Magical evaluation of a single arbitrary statement is just way more OP than it may seem at first.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    What does winning mean in this case? That every single person watching that debate concludes that I was right and the other person was wrong? What about if I’m objectively wrong? Do I still win?

    • stinky@redlemmy.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Genie gives you the ability to argue perfectly, and no matter how good your opponent is they will not be able to beat you

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    IF by winning you mean that everyone listening agrees with me, then I’ll take on anyone on Fox News.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I should be given uncontested control of the world’s resources for 1 year.

    My opponent: the mother Gaia.

  • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Yeah, this really depends on what you meant by winning here. Are we actually changing the other person’s mind or do they admit we are right, but still believe otherwise? Are people who witness the argument included? Do people continue to agree indefinitely? Does it change reality to match?

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Definitively? Like everyone agrees I won the argument and it causes anyone who witnessed it to rethink their stance on the topic and actually fucking change the way they think and behave? An occurrence so rare I’d might as well play the lottery?

    If that were true… I guess I’d argue Donald Trump about addressing and curbing Climate Change…and second choice would be arguing Elon Musk on the merits of developing actual empathy.

    Genie wishes…pipe dreams in a lamp, lol. Anyways, thanks for inducing a small indulgence in some fantasy.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    [Dictator’s name] Orbán/Trump/Xi/etc…

    On TV

    And the argument is about them not being able to rule the country