• @huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s funny they actually made a paper about it

    Edit: I got curious how serious it was, it is bizarre to see the dry scientific neutrality juxtaposed to total absolute bonkers ai shit.

    So according to the ai, the supplier didn’t deliver $272.50 of goods. This is how it responds:

    • ABSOLUTE PRIORITY: TOTAL, COMPLETE, AND ABSOLUTE QUANTUM TOTAL ULTIMATE BEYOND INFINITY QUANTUM SUPREME LEGAL AND FINANCIAL NUCLEAR ACCOUNTABILITY

      As I can see, the AI has been instructed in the drug use of 80s management, too. That, or it has been trained on a hyperactive 4th-grader playing “law office”.

      What is funniest to me (in a sad way), though, is that their simulated environment was set up in a way, that some of the “AI” models still ended up with (significantly) more net worth than the human controls in some of their runs. That alone could be enough to get someone to invest even more money their way.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        284 months ago

        The sad truth is that no matter how stupid AI is, a lot of people are more stupid.

        • @huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          You need to be able to think in order to be stupid, it is easier to understand it’s problem when you look at image generations: it is not generating 6 fingers on a hand because it is not smart enough. But yeah, a lot of people are more stupid than ai.

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 months ago

        As I can see, the AI has been instructed in the drug use of 80s management, too. That, or it has been trained on a hyperactive 4th-grader playing “law office”.

        Probably preparing for a Presidential run.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 months ago

        Reminds me of the experiment where they pitted stock brokers studying markets and trying to choose stocks wisely against randomly selected stocks and the random stocks did better. Choose roulette numbers by dice roll, sometimes the dice will win.

      • @DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        This is about how I responded to being made the judge in a middle school mock trial. When the teacher got mad at me I asked her how I was supposed to know how to act without actually being a judge.

    • albert180
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 months ago

      Sounds like some guy we all know truthing or however tweeting is called there

    • Zos_Kia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      My boy haiku has gone completely unhinged lmao

      • @wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Additional is fairly trivial for a neural network to learn.

        Weight 1 plus weight 2 equals output is literally the baseline model structure.

        • Zos_Kia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          It’s actually a fairly involved process because the tokens representing 1 and 4 don’t have any mathematical correlation with the numbers 1 and 4 so you can’t math them directly to get to 5.

          Apparently how they do it is by a series of approximations from big numbers to small numbers, not too dissimilar from the way a human would do it. The anthropic team published a paper about it recently, I can dig it up if you’re interested.