Its a gift link, so shouldn’t be a paywall :)

    • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Make sure you’re actually registered, even if you think you already are. A lot of states have been “cleaning up” their voting registries .

      • thesprongler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s a census year and you can be unregistered if you don’t respond in a timely fashion. wrong on all counts.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s not a census year (only on the 10s in the US) and I’ve been involved in politics for more than three decades and the federal census has never been used to remove anyone from the voter rolls anywhere I’ve been. The personal data is not publicly available for 70 years except as anonymized, abstracted data.

          EDIT: I did double-check myself and yeah, the Fed census has no impact on voter rolls. There are some places that do a city/town census - especially in Massachusetts - where you can be marked as “inactive” if you don’t complete a local census. You can still cast a ballot and are still on the rolls, but it will require some assertion that you still live in the same residence. But that’s a pretty limited edge case.

          • thesprongler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks for checking. I’m in MA and read that on my town census, but obviously misread it. My bad.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks. Checked a few days ago. I had been kicked off the roles 10+ years ago, never again.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Let me get this straight, you think that Taylor Swift, one of the wealthiest and most powerful women in the world, is secretly a liberal, who spends her nights fucking an NFL star, and your plan is to intimidate this person?

    Good luck.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey Fox, I’m not a Taylor Swift fan at all, but I trust her infinitely more than your lying fascist bullshit network.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why are they allowed to give their opinion on politics but she isn’t? Why are they qualified and not her?

  • weaponG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Taylor Swift to Fox News: “Don’t get involved in journalism…oh wait”

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Taylor Swift is absolutely not the person that the GOP wants saying “Hold my beer and watch this…”. If they pissed her off enough to motivate her to get political, she absolutely has the influence and resources to register a few thousand new Democrat Swifties.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    She hasn’t done or said anything political though? Is it just that she’s a vivacious person and the ghouls are thinking “fuck, she’s definitely not one of us”.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This has less to do with Swift and more to do with Fox’s decades long strategy to keep misogynists angry with successful women and engaged with Fox news.

  • n0m4n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Fox Corp.'s $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems says that Fox should stop libeling. There are plenty of other lawsuits to point out that say the same thing.

    If what Fox claimed were true, they would have won the lawsuit. If what Fox claimed were not provably, knowingly lies, Fox would have won.

    I always side with the person who speaks truth, who fights lies.