• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not species, genes. Species is a socially constructed concept. Selection operates at the level of individual genes which are the fundamental transmissible units.

      Bacteria even carry out horizontal gene transfer via the exchange of plasmids between cells!

  • Kiwi_fella@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I went on a little thought journey about this, partly because I’ll never have my own biological kids (snip snip). Ironically, I have a family tree that is traced back to the 1500s. My branch will just stop. I’m OK with that - this is my choice. There will be a lot of branches that just stop because of unfortunate deaths. The difference is whether it’s by choice or not, maybe?(?) Is this a bad thing anyway?

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    If the avatar icon is the real her, she’s a bit young to decide that finally. Circumstances change and biological clock rings around 30, instincts are a scary thing.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Asexual, sex-repulsed, intersex. Bloodline stops with me for like all the reasons.

    But where a bloodline ends, freezer burrito consumption begins.

  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    24 hours ago

    OP: meh.

    Yeah: Your ancestors are all watching, cheering you on, saying:

    “We NEVER wanted children. FINALLY one of us broke the cycle!!”

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You found my partners family. Literally people who hated children placed a generational curse for thier kids hate their children.

  • kabi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If your ancestry was a tree, what people think of when saying this is the tree getting uprooted, when it really is more akin to cutting off a two, perhaps three growing seasons old branch.

    Which is to say that not even in this teeny tiny way do you matter.

  • noride@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It is pretty crazy to think that for literally thousands of years, every single ancestral pairing, going all the way back to the first lil mud skippers that flopped up on land, have decided to produce offspring, which is ultimately the only reason you’re even alive today.

    And when it’s your turn to uphold the unbroken tradition dating back millennia, you’re just like ‘naaaaaaah, fuck that yo’???

    Honestly that’s fuckin awesome! The point of life is your own personal experience, and you should absolutely do everything you can to push it in the direction of your choosing, tradition be damned. ✌️

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      You know what, at least 7 branches of hominids existed from the same line (12 if you count one evolving to the next) and only one of them lead to us.

    • cassie 🐺@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      The way I see it is that tradition is working pretty damn well on the whole. People are producing kids just fine, taking care of them as they grow and become adults is the hard part. That lineage you point to is the only reason I’m alive today, yes, but there are a lot of other “only reasons” I’m alive today that happened after I was born, and many of them were very much not from my biological parents.

      Personally there was a lot of generational trauma in my upbringing and I don’t wanna pass that on. These days I’ve taken that parental drive and repurposed it toward the adults in my community whose parents have decided to abandon them, usually due to being queer. It’s different than having a parental relationship to a kid, but I’m finding a community guardian role is filling the same emotional need. The people I care for won’t carry my name, but I didn’t even carry my own name lol.

      I used to struggle with the fact that nothing I do will likely outlive me, but now I feel it’s just as worthwhile to make the present day better for the people who need it. I’d still love to work with kids, maybe teach or something, but being trans makes many parents less willing to allow their kids to be around me. I might foster someday, it’ll be a challenge but I think it’s something I’d get a lot more out of.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    also japanese. also didn’t inherit the hardwired instinctual urge to pass on my genes ¯\__(ツ)__/¯

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I do the same thing, but I regard it as carrying on the proud tradition of kings, like Charles IV and Richard III, who have done this before me.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jokes’ on my ancestors, we’ve been getting through a bottleneck for the last 3 generations. All only children… at least on my mum’s side, my dad’s side’s not faring much better with my generation and our kids

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I always find that funny, people only think about their branch but I’m looking at my family tree and even though my branch stops, my cousins have kids, the family lives on, so who cares about the bloodline bullshit?