• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How the fuck do you let any level 2 system go 40 to 50 fucking feet down the railroad tracks.

    We’re they asleep?

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure I’d be able to sleep through driving on the railroad tracks. I’m going to guess this person was simply incredibly fucking stupid, and thought the car would figure it out, instead of doing the bare fucking minimum of driving their goddamn 2 ton heavy death machine themself.

      • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m going to guess this person was simply incredibly fucking stupid

        Well, the guy owned a Tesla, it was pretty obvious.

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was gonna say it’s not so much the fact that the car was hit by a train, but that it turned on to the tracks …but 40 or 50 feet?

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cop: WTF happened here?

        Driver: It drove itself onto the tracks

        Cop: Okay, but what about the other 49 feet of the 50 feet it’s on the tracks?

        Driver: …

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing that strikes me about both this story and the thing you posted is that the people in the Tesla seem to be like “this is fine” as the car does some pretty terrible stuff.

      In that one, Tesla failing to honor a forced left turn instead opting to go straight into oncoming lanes and waggle about causing things to honk at them, the human just sits there without trying to intervene. Meanwhile they describe it as “navigation issue/hesitation” which really understates what happened there.

      The train one didn’t come with video, but I can’t imagine just letting my car turn itself onto tracks and going 40 feet without thinking.

      My Ford even thinks about going too close to another lane and I’m intervening even if it was really going to be no big deal. I can’t imagine this level of “oh well”.

      Tesla drivers/riders are really nuts…

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    If only there was a way to avoid the place where trains drive.

    I checked first. They didn’t make a turn into a crossing. It turned onto the tracks. Jalopnik says there’s no official statement that it was actually driving under FSD(elusion) but if it was strictly under human driving (or FSD turned itself off after driving off) I guarantee Tesla will invade privacy and slander the driver by next day for the sake of court of public opinion

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      They didn’t make a turn into a crossing. It turned onto the tracks.

      Just to be clear for others, it did so at a crossing. That’s still obviously not what it should have done and it’s no defence of the self-driving feature, but I read your comment as suggesting it had found its way onto train tracks by some other route.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks. I could have clarified better myself. I meant “didn’t turn from a rail-parallel road onto a crossing to be met by a train it couldn’t reasonably detect due to bad road design”

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tesla’s self-driving is pretty shite but they seem to have a particular problem with railway crossings, as also pointed out in the article. Of all of the obstacles for the self-driving system to fail to detect, the several thousand tons of moving steel is probably one of the worst outcomes.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe if they use LIDAR like they should have instead of just cameras it wouldn’t be such an issue, but they’re determined to minimize costs and maximize profits at the expense of consumers as are all publicly traded companies

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t understand. Musk likes how they look, we can’t disturb that for “safety”!

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Or it no longer has anything to do with making a vehicle look cool.

          The Lucid Air is equipped with up to 32 on-board sensors, including long range Lidar radar, short-range radar, surround view monitoring cameras.

          It’s because musk treats all his businesses like startups, and no matter how successful they get, in the interest of “trimming the fat” he’d like to keep people buying inferior products at a higher profit margin than thinking about better investment and long term growth, just like many companies.

  • atlien51@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Elongated Musketon: UM THAT WAS JUST 1 FAULTY MODEL STOP CHERRY PICKING GUYS JUST BUY IT!!!1

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, he did specifically come up with his idiotic “Hyperloop” concept to kill California’s high speed rail project

    • lsibilla@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      For as much as I’d like to see Tesla stock crash these days, and without judging on the whole autonomous car topic, this IS cherrypicking.

      Human drivers aren’t exactly flawless either, but we won’t ban human driven cars because some acts recklessly or other had a seizure while driving.

      If statistically self driving cars are safer, I’d rather have them and reduce the risk of coming across another reckless driver.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        yes we should be doing more to reduce driving, it’s relatively unsafe and I’m sick of our lived environments being designed for cars and not people.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Car drove itself on to the tracks, gets hit by a train. This is some Maximum Overdrive shit.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    What a cool and futuristic car. It’s all computer!

    I’m still waiting for Elon’s car to drive onto train tracks.