Project 2025’s 180-Day Playbook is a remarkably detailed guide to turning the United States into a fascist’s paradise.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    257
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Perfect time to teach Biden a lesson by not voting for him – or so I’ve been told by those with too much privilege and not enough brainpower.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m voting for Biden to stave off Jerry Lewis Hitler, as I did last cycle and Clinton before.

      That said, a lot of Biden enthusiasts need to stop with the “you also need to say you like him and his politics” crap.

      No one should feel enthused about always getting wildly varying degrees of bad as the only choice, merely afraid. At this point we’re voting whether to keep the water pumps on as Titanic sinks to buy a little time instead of declaring the water at our waist “fake.”

      Vote to keep the pumps on, sure, but it helps nothing to pretend our rigged capitalist hellscape, that neoliberals and fascists alike declare as “the only way,” isn’t eating the itself and us and defended by both parties far above the people (we will take every measure to protect our beloved society economy! Here Fed, I’m sure you’ll ensure these relief funds trickle down after private shareholders get plenty of relief, of course), while it continues wrecking the planet for a few more short term cash grabs before the owners fly off to their prepared havens, con complete. Nox.

      A vote for Biden is a vote for us to not add state sponsored scapegoating, persecution, and ending bodily autonomy to our doom in motion like a cherry. Yes let’s do that(edit: meaning vote for Biden if unclear)…

      https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/warmest-arctic-summer-on-record-is-evidence-of-accelerating-climate-change

      …but don’t delude yourself into believing it’s any kind of salvation.

      • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        …but don’t delude yourself into believing it’s any kind of salvation

        Why, are there very many evangelical democrats that need reminding?

        I just want a functional fucking government

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        That said, a lot of Biden enthusiasts need to stop with the “you also need to say you like him and his politics” crap.

        That’s certainly not a significantly pervasive mindset – at least not around here. The general sentiment is “hold your nose and vote for him anyways”.

      • mellowheat@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That said, a lot of Biden enthusiasts need to stop with the “you also need to say you like him and his politics” crap.

        What’s great about this is that the lack of awareness and strategy practically guarantees that far left will never rule in the US.

        What sucks about is that since vote margins are always razor thin, saying things like that might very well put Larry the Fascist Guy back to power.

      • ferralcat@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        No one is saying you have to be enthused. They’re saying you have to pretend to be enthused. Because the strategy of “I’m going to tell everyone I hate this guy so I don’t loose any cool points with my friends who the maturity of 16 year olds” is a losing one for you and minorities and LGBT people and women and basically everyone you’re fucking over.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They’re all over the fucking place here. It’s wild. They’re almost for certain foreign cointelpro.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I do think theyre making perfect be the enemy of, well not exactly good, but in this case the better option, but Im not so sure theyre foreign ops. If you were running a campaign like that, wouldnt you want to concentrate your messaging on the places where the greatest number of people would be to see it, or at least a lot of people? Lemmy is certainly not immune to influence campaigns, Id bet it might even be more vulnerable than most given the lack of central control that might try to inhibit one, but its also currently incredibly small and obscure as far as social networks go. Would it really be considered worth the resources, to such a campaign, in its current state?

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Agreed. They’re dangerous and privileged – it really doesn’t need to be more complicated than that.

          • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Haha, yeah nothing to see here.

            There was a point in 2016 when the bernouts started spouting on about how they were now voting for Trump. It’s the exact same situation. They will disingenuously demand something that is not feasible then they will show their true colors while acting like they didn’t intend on voting Trump from the get go.

            For the love of god don’t fall for it again.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Imagine voting for neolibs and having the gall to call progressives privileged. Progressives are younger and lower income but sure we’re the privileged ones. You don’t give a shit about anything except character assassinating anyone you see as an enemy. There’s never any honest attempt at engagement from you people.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Imagine advocating for actions that directly increase the risk of a Trump presidency.

              Grow up.

              • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Oh no, how dare I publicly criticize a political candidate in a democracy. It’s fucking crazy that you think you’re actually one of the good guys. This is exactly the kind of shit fascists say to shut down opposition.

        • mellowheat@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Would it really be considered worth the resources, to such a campaign, in its current state?

          I think it’s more about the fact that this is the only place that doesn’t just ban them.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        58
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They’re almost for certain foreign cointelpro.

        Where do I collect my cheque?

        What we’re telling y’all is that voting one more time for a neoliberal isn’t going to make a meaningful change in stopping the inevitable descent into fascism that neoliberal policies have facilitated for the last 40 or 50 years.

        It’s like the saying goes: the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

        • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re saying in one breath that Trump and Biden are the same and in the next that voting for either one of them equally insane. Both of those things are plainly false.

          Won’t make a difference means zero difference but Trump is literally the accelerationist choice.

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            38
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You need to work on your reading comprehension. I never said they are the same. I said one is the product of the other.

            People have been telling you this would happen for forty or fifty years.

            • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              isn’t going to make a meaningful change

              My reading comprehension is just fine. You need an argument and it’s not the one that you’re getting.

              • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                9 months ago

                Surely what the Democrats are doing is effective, and Christo fascism is now less of a threat than it was in 2016 and 2020. Right? They should clearly keep doing the same thing, it’s working super well!

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          The thing is: the US is not a well-functioning democracy. It currently tries to be to some extent, but it’s system especially at the national level is set up in a way that heavily biases power towards wealthy interests and rural states, both of which tend to favor conservative politics, and which mathematically garuntees only two parties can be viable at a time, with third parties merely providing a negative effect on whatever major party is closer to them. In a well designed democratic system, there’d be a much greater variety of political groups to support such that one that actually reasonably approximates a given person’s views may exist, and voting for those groups would have practical consequence. But, we don’t have that. Voting isn’t completely inconsequential, hence one should still do it, but in our current state it’s not enough to fix things by itself. But again, since it still does something even if not enough, it makes sense to try to get as much utility as possible out of it. At the moment, the only candidates that have any chance whatsoever of winning are a neoliberal and a fascist. Now, you can argue that the popularity of the fascist is a result of the failures of neoliberal policies and so voting for the candidate supporting those policies won’t stop the popularity of the fascist ones, and that could be true- but the fascist is just going to bring about the fascist policies even faster. “The candidate that can fix things” isn’t on the ballot of either major party right now, and the system mathematically garuntees that third parties are counterproductive at this level, so voting for meaningful change isn’t an option here.

          I’m not saying one should give up pushing for meaningful change. I’m saying that at the moment, getting that change is going to require more than just voting, at least at the national level and especially in the presidential election. I do not plan on voting for Biden in the coming general election because I am under some illusion that he’s going to fix things. I plan on voting for him to stall for time. It isn’t exiting, it’s downright depressing, but on balance, it’s still more moral in my view to take that option than the fascistic one, or to do nothing at all.

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Exactly… It’s almost like there’s no interest to change any of that from those who benefit and continuing to vote for them or support them will continue to perpetuate this inevitable spiral.

            Sometimes the only winning move is not to play. - Joshua (John Wood), War Games, 1983

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Sometimes the only winning move is not to play.

              Perhaps, but this is not one of those times.

              Half the country DGAF about Gaza, but wants to remove your bodily autonomy, persecute minorities, and undermine all future elections.

              They’re going to vote.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are millions of people who will read the first half of your comment, think it’s a good idea and skip the rest. What have you done?

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or billions, even. Billions and billions. Good people, the best kind of people. I know them, personally.

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perfect time for Democrats to nominate an 81 yo guy that most people think it’s too old to run. This election won’t even be close if someone other than Biden ran. His accomplishments don’t really matter in the face of his mortality.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did you canvas for anyone else to challenge him in your state’s primary?

        Because you had time.

        • nieceandtows@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          You know nobody else stands a chance against an incumbent president in a primary unless the president drops out on their own, so that’s a moot point just for the sake of arguing.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            So “this election won’t even be close if someone other than Biden ran” but it wasn’t worth trying to primary him?

            • nieceandtows@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              Like I said, DNC and Biden himself needs to realize that he should step down, given that this is a very important election. If they don’t want to do that, there’s nothing anybody else can do about it. Your point is moot and you know it. Talk to Dean Phillips and ask him how his campaign is going. Being too idealistic just for the sake of argument doesn’t help anybody. Need to be more practical.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Oh right, because individual citizens can beat the entire democratic party machine on their own. What a ridiculous fucking comment.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s how grassroots democracy works. But it’s much easier to sit on your ass and berate people on the internet.

    • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      9 months ago

      Or you could say that this issue and all the others mean so little to the Democratic Party that running anybody but Genocide Joe is off the table.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hi, it’s me, a Palestinian American, how about don’t use my people’s plight to justify letting the guy who wants to deport my ass for liking Knaffeh get into office?

        I have enough issues without truck nuts McGee feeling re-emboldened to call me Sand Nigger and Towelhead.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thank you so much, friend. I don’t think these “Genocide Joe” people understand what Trump has planned.

          I wonder if they’re even aware that he’s already announced that he wouldn’t accept any Palestinian refugees?

          https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-vows-expand-travel-ban-gaza-rcna120711

          Or how about his plan to sacrifice the West Bank for a “Gaza Plus” without full statehood, where somehow Egypt gives up the Sainai Peninsula, all Palestinians, including Palestinians in the West Bank and Egypt, are forced to live there, and all right of return claims are nullified in perpetuity?

          https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/12/11/trump-s-plan-for-israel-and-palestine-one-more-step-away-from-peace-pub-77905

          And then there’s Project 2025, where Trump and Republicans plan to make the U.S. a Christian theocracy. How do they think Muslim Americans will be treated?

          But none of that matters because they can call Biden “Genocide Joe” and say not to vote for him because of it.

          • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            That sounds absolutely bonkers and I don’t want any of that to come to pass. But I can’t sleep with myself at night knowing that I’m voting for someone who is going out of his way to send weapons to facilitate an active genocide.

            Instead of framing this as my failing for bringing about Trump because I won’t vote for continued genocide, try to see it in terms of your (the rhetorical “your”) failing by insisting that my choice be fixed between enabling an atrocious genocide or bringing about the end of our civilization. The solution is the obvious third choice, run somebody else beside Biden. He is too unpalatable to reliably beat Trump, so don’t run him.

            Insisting that we hold our nose and vote for an unelectable candidate failed with Clinton (how we got Trump the first time) and she was just unpopular. Going ahead with the same demonstrably failed strategy with someone who is a direct party to a genocide is even more foolish.

            I’m not going to vote for Biden unless he reins in Israel and stops facilitating war crimes there and it’s still going to be hard knowing what he has done. I would vote for any other Democrat that runs in his place. Insulting me because I won’t vote for a candidate who is a party to war crimes won’t work. If you need my vote, you can’t ask me to do what I’m telling you I won’t do. There’s nine months to figure out how to get the DNC to run another candidate in place of Biden. If you don’t want to risk Trump again, you should consider that option.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              The solution is the obvious third choice, run somebody else beside Biden. He is too unpalatable to reliably beat Trump, so don’t run him.

              Fine. Which one of those obvious third choices did you canvas for in your state?

              I’m not going to vote for Biden unless he reins in Israel and stops facilitating war crimes there and it’s still going to be hard knowing what he has done.

              Bold of you to do that in the face of a Palestinian person telling you that you’re in the wrong for that position. I guess you know what’s best for them.

              Also interesting that you didn’t say that to them, but said it to me.

              • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                9 months ago

                So you’re insisting that your role in this is really nothing more than to tell me I’m wrong for not voting for Biden and that I’m to blame for whatever comes? I’m not the only person who feels this way and I’m informing you that this strategy of yours is unduly dangerous. Digging in and trying to shame a couple of people on the internet isn’t mitigating the risk here.

                That some self-proclaimed internet Palestinian says that they’re ok with somebody sending a fascist state the weapons that are being used to murder innocent people doesn’t change my view on things. If I tell you that I’m Palestinian too, will that change your mind?

        • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not the guy who wants Trump in office. I’m just the one who doesn’t want to vote for somebody who is repeatedly bypassing Congress to send weapons to literal fascists committing war crimes. That’s someone I can’t just hold my nose and vote for. His political career is over.

          Why can’t we have any of the other people who ran in the 2020 Democratic primaries instead of Biden? This idea that it absolutely has to be Biden or else the DNC will let the country fall apart with Trump is so completely messed up.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Why can’t we have any of the other people who ran in the 2020 Democratic primaries instead of Biden?

            Which one of them did you canvas for?

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I like how someone actually responded to your ridiculous question and you suddenly stop mouthing off to people. What a surprise. /s

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                You mean the comment posted 22 minutes ago when I wasn’t active here? My apologies for not being on Lemmy on your specific schedule.

            • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Dean Phillips, but he has little chance against an incumbent who has the support of the Party leadership. In order for anyone to solidly beat him in the primaries, Biden would need to step down or the Party would need to acknowledge that the Clinton strategy of pushing their pick even if unpopular isn’t a safe one.

              Voters tend to not show up for primaries against incumbents, but unenthusiastic or marginalized voters also tend to not show up to elections. Or put another way, an incumbent winning a primary isn’t indicative of a candidate winning an election. And I have no faith that Biden can win an election. That the DNC does is frightening and delusional.

              Or are you saying that you wouldn’t vote for any Democratic candidate except Biden? What on earth does the party have to lose by having Biden step down?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                What exactly did you do to help Dean Phillips’ campaign?

                Or are you saying that you wouldn’t vote for any Democratic candidate except Biden? What on earth does the party have to lose by having Biden step down?

                I’ll vote for whoever will stop Trump to prevent the ongoing queer genocide you apparently don’t care much about from getting worse and taking my daughter with it.

                Who do you suggest I vote for if Biden appears to be the one most likely to save my daughter’s life?

                • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  lol, it’s nothing but moving goalposts with you, is it?

                  Your daughter’s life doesn’t mean enough to you to help me get an electable candidate through the primaries. When she asks you what you did to save her, you can say you argued with people on the internet. Sleep with that on your conscience.

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Back in reality, the choices are a) vote for Biden, b) vote for Trump, and c) don’t vote. That’s it, those are your choices.

            Just know that options b and c help Trump. You can bend and twist reality in any shape you want, but that is the actual effect of those choices.

            So ask yourself, do you want Trump as president?

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Genocide Joe

        Jesus Christ. The US government has never given a single shit about the plight of the Palestinians.

        The politicians just need a bit more time steeping before they’ll be ready to pretend that they supported Palestine all along. That is of course, if the public continues to like the cause.

        • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, but this is part of the process. If we don’t call them out, they assume that everything is peachy and the status quo is their mandate. I’ll admit it’s inflammatory and over the top, but it’s sort of catchy.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s more realistic: Shaming everyone in the country until they vote for someone doing genocide, or telling Biden to stop facilitating a genocide?

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          9 months ago

          You have completely lost the plot. The election isn’t for 7 months.

          Instead of convincing Biden to stop the genocide, which he can do right now, today, you’re spending your time trying to get people to say they’re gonna vote for Biden even if he continues facilitating genocide.

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And that’s a major over simplification. Biden isn’t God he can’t snap his fingers and make Israel do what he wants, certainly not without putting the alliance between the US and Israel at risk … and it’s getting to be a dangerous time in the world when having friends is important.

            Just today they announced the US would be air dropping aid to Gaza. It’s not like nothing is being done. I’d like more to be done, but yeah I’m voting for him either way because the alternative is Trump. I’m not going to pretend I’m not voting for him and the many other things he’s done and his policy objectives that I like because of the actions of another country that he’s supporting… Matching decades of US policy precedent.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Biden isn’t God he can’t snap his fingers and make Israel do what he wants

              He can stop sending them the tools they’re using to carry out genocide. Ronald Reagan merely threatened to do it once and they came to heel.

              the alliance between the US and Israel

              Israel depends on the US for its existence. They will do what is required for financial, military, and diplomatic aid.

              it’s getting to be a dangerous time in the world when having friends is important.

              How friendly do we look when we’re facilitating a genocide, and bombing Yemen for trying to do something about it?

              Dropping food does not make up for our client state machine gunning people trying to get food.

              If the US really wanted to make friends, they’d oppose the existence of a zionist ethnostate.

              • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                https://www.legion.org/landingzone/260767/why-america-cares-about-israel’s-security

                What you’re proposing would be a pretty radical shake up in the US approach to the middle east. The equivalent of telling all our current friends to fuck off and the people we’ve been saying fuck off to, hey do you want to be friends and let us place this critical military infrastructure in your country?

                Some might even call it insane, because who is going to go for that?

                Israel depends on the US but the US also depends on Israel. This isn’t a free lunch they’ve been given and they know it. They’ve also got the equivalent of Trump as their prime minister currently and I really don’t think he cares about any of that anymore than you do.

                His country was attacked and his policy is scorched earth. He’s not going to stop if the US stops sending help. His “iron dome” will fall though and then he’s going to just throw everything he’s got at eliminating Palestine.

                The only thing more dangerous than an angry nation is an angry nation with nothing to lose and a vendetta.

                I don’t like any of this. However, for fuck sake Joe Biden is not out there in a cheerleading outfit yelling “go Israel, murder innocent civilians.” Things are rarely so simple as “just (don’t) do X.” Hell, that’s half the problem with Trump, he’ll just say shit like “well let’s just nuke the hurricane.” We end up with two problems a nuclear bomb and a hurricane.

                If the Israel prime minister was anyone but Netanyahu things might be different.

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The equivalent of telling all our current friends to fuck off and the people we’ve been saying fuck off to

                  It is not. We took the same steps for Apartheid South Africa.

                  The only thing more dangerous than an angry nation is an angry nation with nothing to lose and a vendetta.

                  You know what’s worse than an angry nation? An angry nation with more weapons.

                  Joe Biden is not out there in a cheerleading outfit yelling “go Israel, murder innocent civilians.”

                  He is giving them the bombs they are using to carry out a genocide, there is no meaningful difference.

    • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      I guess being a Muslim and feeling pain when I see a dead baby is “privilege” nowadays. Have you considered the idea that for some people not funding a genocide is more important than anything else? You can’t keep bombing the middle east, say “orange man bad” and expect people to vote for you. I don’t give a shit at this point. I’ll vote for whoever’s running against a person who took a dime from AIPAC.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I guess being a Muslim and feeling pain when I see a dead baby is “privilege” nowadays.

        Weird guess, but no.

        Privilege is knowing that not voting for Biden increases the risk of a Trump presidency, and making that choice anyways. The only way it isn’t is if you genuinely believe Trump would be better.

        Orange man is bad. Of course he is.

        • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Oh I didn’t say I’m not voting for Biden. Read again. I said I’m voting for whoever’s running against a person that took a dime from AIPAC. Fuck anyone who thinks what’s going on in Palestine is acceptable. Things wouldn’t have come to this point if morons like you actually spoke up and protested against Biden instead of calling people idiots for not voting for him. But your privileged ass didn’t do shit for genocide and now want people to go crazy over LGBTQ rights.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If you’re voting for Biden, then you’re pretty clearly not the type of person I’m calling privileged, right?

            Things wouldn’t have come to this point if morons like you actually spoke up and protested against Biden

            Don’t call me a moron. And don’t claim that I didn’t speak out against Biden. Be better than that.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Fuck off with your privilege bullshit. You don’t know any of the people you’re talking to. Straight up character assassination.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        “I don’t like the guy who’s not cutting off funding to Israel because he thinks a soft touch is needed to talk them off the ledge, so I’m going to let the guy who handed them East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights back into office.”

        That’s what fetishizers think any muslims or arabs (because they are not the same thing l3anhon’allah!!!) will do here and cite to justify letting “orange man” back into office.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Have you considered the idea that for some people not funding a genocide is more important than anything else?

        Do you really think orange stain isn’t going to start absolutely pouring money into Israel? If you think it’s bad now

        In the US we are currently stuck with a 2 party system, a vote for any third party candidate is a throwaway vote in a presidential election.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Actually, voting for a 3rd party is almost always a vote for Trump. The people talking about abstaining or voting 3rd party are overwhelmingly of progressive mindset.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            The people talking about abstaining or voting 3rd party are overwhelmingly of progressive mindset.

            so it’s not a vote for trump at all. in fact, he’s running on the republican ticket, so a vote for a so-called third party would be a vote against him.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nope z that isn’t how math works. You make the incorrect assumption that those people would ok d vote for Democrats if they didn’t have a choice, which all dats shows is wrong.

            A vote for a third party is equivalent to not voting. That’s a fucking fact z and I’m sick of you liars trump to bully people into voting for your corporate protofascist. It’s never worked and never will, but that won’t stop you from doing it because it’s so much easier than engaging someone and validating their concerns. A

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ll vote for whoever’s running against a person who took a dime from AIPAC.

        In other words, you’ll vote for someone who has zero chance of winning.

        Why bother voting at all?

        By the way, you might want to look up Project 2025 and Trump’s plan to turn the U.S. into a Christian theocracy. You’ll probably feel a lot more pain as a Muslim when it’s happening to you.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yep. I’ve had multiple people suggest that Biden would be just as bad when it came to the rights of queer people. The sad thing is, some people get convinced by that.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Some people really will believe anything about someone they don’t like. Like I’m not a Biden fan, but he has been solidly ok for a US President

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Exactly. I can hold my breath and vote for a candidate I don’t like if his opponent is a fascist. Especially one so brazen.

            We didn’t get here by fascists holding their vote unless the right went right enough. They spread their ideology and encouraged people to see it as bit enough of a problem to abandon their single issue while indoctrinating enough people into their camp to gain the ability to primary in sufficiently fascist candidates.

            We on the far left need to become a dependable voting block that is worth courting then start winning primaries.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              We didn’t get here by fascists holding their vote unless the right went right enough.

              That is a very good point I plan on using in the future.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Glad to help. My wife and I have been discussing how we got here lately and I think that’s an important discussion for the left to have. While we were arguing the far right gerrymandered half the country and took control of their party.

                Tactics are cause agnostic. It’s a valuable lesson to learn for two reasons: your enemies will steal any tactic you use on them and you can steal any tactic they use too. Some tactics don’t work for some causes, you can’t manipulate fear and xenophobia to create a diverse society of equality and acceptance. But we can primary the shit out of anyone unwilling to deal with climate change or who isn’t fully in favor of an explicit right to privacy and bodily autonomy. We can have a left wing version of the tea party.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Someone just earlier today told me that Biden and Trump’s policies were exactly the same except maybe on abortion. They 100% believe that. I don’t know if they’re stupid, ignorant, or evil.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have gotten a ban for reporting very obvious right wing trolls flying under the thinnest veneer of “leftist” ideology. It’s pretty clear that this is a top down issue on certain instances

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure, right wings are way way worse, yes, don’t vote for Trump, vote for (probably) Biden

      But don’t fall in the trap where you just block anyone that disagrees, or you’ll find yourself becoming that which you hate, just on the other side.

      Just because Biden isn’t as bad as trump, it’s a VERY low bad to cross and there is plenty to criticize. Still vote for Biden, obviously, but that doesn’t mean he should get a free pass

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not enough people say that. I assume you want trump elected or -if Biden is elected- that we aren’t allowed to criticize Biden at all?

          Vote Biden, doh, but don’t stop being critical

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I keep telling people- the queer genocide that has already begun with Republican restrictions on trans rights and medical care is going to ramp way up and encompass queer people as a whole. Including my daughter.

    And yet I keep being told I’m excusing genocide by voting for Biden in order to stop Trump from killing her.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      And yet I keep being told I’m excusing genocide by voting for Biden in order to stop Trump from killing her.

      Lucky. I’m being told that I’m endorsing it for the same reason.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The thing I love is that I ask them- name me a candidate that has a significant chance of beating Trump who isn’t Joe Biden.

        Obviously, they can’t. But they try very hard to avoid that.

    • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Do you think this might be conflating internet-style “genocide” with the kind of genocide that involves gunning people down at an aid truck while they queue for food during a famine?

      Moot point as I really don’t think either party would be doing anything to stop the crisis. I do think we should be more careful with how we dilute language, though.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Not all genocides involve shooting people at an aid truck.

        Some US laws have been described, including by journalists Emily St. James and Katelyn Jones, as meeting criteria mentioned in the United Nations definition of genocide, including laws banning gender-affirming care (“causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”), and those allowing child protective services to pursue child abuse claims against the parents of children receiving gender-affirming care and remove said children (“forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”).[26][27]

        Transgender healthcare bans in the US have been condemned by medical organizations. A report published by Yale School of Medicine in response to bans on gender-affirming care in Alabama and Texas argued that the bans were no more ethical than a prohibition on healthcare for any other life-threatening medical condition.[28] The president of World Professional Association of Transgender Health wrote an opinion article in the New York Times stating her view that these laws constituted an effort to “rid the world of transgender people.”[29] Similar sentiments were expressed in a WPATH public communique: “Anti-transgender health care legislation is not about protections for children but about eliminating transgender persons on a micro and macro scale.”[30]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_genocide#United_States

        WASHINGTON — The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) — the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) civil rights organization — denounced the onslaught of transphobic statements threaded throughout the annual CPAC political gathering this past weekend. For several days extremist politicians and commentators peppered hateful statements toward trans people casually through remarks on unrelated topics. The wave of hatred culminated with a speech in which a Daily Wire commentator called for the “eradication” of transgender people.

        https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-extremists-at-cpac-laid-bare-hatred-at-root-of-vile-legislation-targeting-trans-people

        The social conservative wish list calls for ending abortion, diversity and inclusion efforts, protections for LGBTQ people, and most importantly, banning any and all LGBTQ content. In fact, “The Mandate for Leadership” makes eradicating LGBTQ people from public life its top priority. Its No. 1 promise is to “restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children.” They are explicit in how they plan to do so, as you’ll see in the paragraph below. They plan to proceed by declaring any and all LGBTQ content to be pornographic in nature.

        “Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

        https://www.damemagazine.com/2023/08/14/the-gop-has-a-master-plan-to-criminalize-being-trans/

        And if you think Joe Biden is in favor of any of that, you’re insane.

        I am getting really fucking tired of people telling me I should sacrifice my daughter to this genocide because there’s another genocide somewhere else. Along with people like you denying it’s even happening so you can accuse people like me of supporting a different genocide.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, don’t get hysterical. I don’t want to kill your child, and I’m not accusing you of supporting… anything, really.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Denying that an ongoing genocide perpetuated by Republicans that my child will be caught up in if Trump gets elected isn’t even happening implies that, at the very least, you don’t give a shit if my child dies and that voting for Biden wouldn’t help anyway.

            Because it’s either that or you are totally ignorant of many years of Republican attitudes towards queer people in the U.S. and the many attempts to erase them from society which are only gaining steam.

            And I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t live under a rock.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    9 months ago

    Between Trump installing 3 Supreme Court Justices, having his SC cronies overturn and I quote “SETTLED LAW” on Roe V. Wade and PP V. Casey, giving Putin access to one or plural NOC lists, withholding military aid to Ukraine because he knew that Putin was going to launch a full scale invasion, divulging classified info to Russian diplomats in the White House, asking Russian hackers to hack Hilary’s campaign, are the American people angry yet?

    • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      None of us is ready to take action without the mob to shield us with relative anonymity and numbers. A great deal of the government’s effect in our lives is to disconnect us from each other and give us the impression we depend on it instead. It is quite a persuasive fallacy.

      But yes, we’re angry, we’re just kept in a perpetual state of frustrated will.

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Funny how the whole ‘Make America Great Again’ helped only the rich. And the country that was aided the most was Russia with this movement.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hate being right sometimes. Pretty soon interracial marriage will somehow be a topic again.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    If any state decides to do this, then it deserves to suffer a brain drain of LBGTQ people and allies who will gladly take their immeasurable skills and talents elsewhere. In short, doing something like this is a good way to ensure the death of one’s state.

    However, the “I am moving to another state” or whatever tactic is shortsighted, and not everyone can afford it. The better tactic is to organize political action, protest and VOTE Democrat. The only political party in any meaningful position to favor LGBT+ rights is the Democrats.

    • parricc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      9 months ago

      Moving to another state is more than just affordability anyway. People shouldn’t have to give up their homes and everything they’ve known. So many states with far right legislatures have a gerrymandered to hell population that’s 45% very liberal. Half of the population is just being completely disregarded and considered subhuman.

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m in a red state; so far my healthcare has been denied and the new censorship laws targeting education are making me realize I need to flee if at all possible. It will take a lot of time, money, and effort to move, but the writing is on the wall.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        And the last thing we should do is bunch ourselves up in one spot, or even in one State. That’s just doing their work for them. all they’d have to do if we moved to one State or one general area is to build walls around it. They’d follow Israel’s example and keep us all in one spot, genociding us through attrition. Cut us off from food and utilities, blockade our ports so supplies from other countries can’t get in, cut us off from communications so we can’t tell nobody what’s going on, and watch from the top of their walls as we die.

    • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah but why do WE always have to move far away. Expensive, tons of bother , and news flash, we’re not all super geniuses, some of us are just fry cooks. Queer janitors deserve freedom from the shitstains of humanity too

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I ran away and was better for it. I’d have self deleted if I had to remain in the shitstain place I was born in. You have to do what you have to do and usually that means finding a safe place far away from angry people.

        • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m really, really glad you ran away & survived to tell the tale. On your worst days, you remember that you took care of yourself like that, yeah?💪✌️🫶

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s their plan. They want to cement minority rule by consolidating Democrats into fewer states so they will always win the electoral college. Only having hateful idiots in their state is a pro for them, not a con. It gives them more power.

        • interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If you can hack it. My wife is trans and we live in a swing state, the stress of the ruling class playing with her human rights for points is real

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Conservatives Plan to Ban Abortion and Cut LGBT Rights

    There’s a problem with this headline.

    If they f**k with long-established law like this, they’re not “conservatives”.

    • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Conservative doesn’t mean they don’t want to change things, that’s an intentional misconception. Its obvious if you see how much settled precedent they are willing to overturn. Conservatives just believe they deserve power, they think they have the divine right to rule over others and that other people do not have that right.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Conservative doesn’t mean they don’t want to change things, that’s an intentional misconception.

        Indeed; they are the masters of Orwellian doublespeak.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I used to think that, but these days I think it’s basically the No True Scotsman fallacy. When most of the the people who call themselves conservative are fascists, then conservatism is fascism. It wasn’t always, but it is now.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure they are. It’s just what they considered long established and what you consider long established are different. They don’t want to go back to the 70s. They want to go back to the Gilded Age. Or Hell a straight-up feudal monarchy.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re conservative insofar as they think peak society was when only cishet white men were allowed to participate.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    I remember when republicans were about less government. Pepperidge farms remembers….

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t think they ever truly were. They’ve always supported the expansion of the military and police, having shit loads of foreign military bases, controlling women, controlling the LGBTQ+. The only way they could ever be considered to be wanting less government is in the form of their laissez-faire, pro-privitization economic policy, which just lets corporations do whatever the hell they like. So all it is, is trading one form of control to another. Instead of government controlling things, corporations control everything.

      The GOP platform is, and always has been anti-freedom.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, many accept what they’re told at face value and don’t have the critical thinking skills to know the difference.

      • captainthroatfuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        At the risk of sounding like Peterson (but reversed right to left), it’s always been about an in group that deserves to rule, and an out group that people punish. It’s that simple with them, why all the hypocrisy. It’s literally that simple. I’m a good guy, they’re bad, they disagree with me, that means they’re bad and should be punished. Zero sum game stuff

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I remember when republicans were about less government.

      They never really were. They’ve always been the party of corporate cronyism, with “less government” only ever applying to institutions from which they couldn’t generate profit.

      • winky9827b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Small government has only ever meant minimal regulation. It means nothing when it comes to civil rights or liberties.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wish it meant minimal regulation.

          But set aside abortion and immigration. I’m seeing some crazy efforts to regulate the solar and wind energy industries. I’m seeing efforts to restrict how municipal governments can operate education and transportation infrastructure. In Austin TX, the state government threatened to take over the municipal police department. In Houston TX, they removed the Independent School District and installed their own flacks. Texas law prohibits state agencies and political subdivisions (“Governmental Entities”) from contracting with businesses that boycott energy companies, discriminate against firearm entities or associations, or boycott Israel, which has an enormous impact on the statewide financial system.

          So, I’m seeing lots of statewide regulation.

  • corymbia@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    If he would only just extend his fingers when he gestured like that. Then it would be a lot clearer to more people what a nasty thing he is.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its 2016 all over again.

    Every effort to drag the Democratic party over to any kind of popular position is getting labeled as a betrayal. Every effort to oppose Republicans at the state and local level is denounced as uncivil. And as soon as the dust settles in November, the national media will fall in love with the winner, and grow increasingly irate at anyone critical of this abysmally unpopular tumor of a Presidency.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      More like 50. They wrote their playbook in the 1970s, and have finally started seeing the fruits of their labor. If we can shut them down hard in this election, and the midterms, and the next election, the GOP may finally die. That doesn’t mean these people will stop trying to take control. They brainwash their kids into being true believers. This isn’t politics to them, it’s a holy war.

      http://benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I appreciate the positivity. With all the evil this party keeps perpetrating, things keep on looking so bleak. However, if one then looks at how the party is basically dead in some US states and dying in most of the rest, it does make it look like we may still be able to save America from this traitorous scum. The people that fell victim to their lies and manipulation can be put back on track and stop feeling pointlessly angry for reasons they don’t quite understand, and start having self-worth and help this country prosper again.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every election I ask myself can these choices even get worse (as in presidential candidates). My question is always answered exactly 4 years later with an unequivocal “yes.”