Donald Trump, who is not the president, is using a minority of Republicans to block aid to Ukraine, to undermine the actual president’s foreign policy, and to weaken American power and credibility.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Man does literally everything that would help Putin.

      “Conservatives”: He’s the toughest president ever on Russia! You have TDS! Ukraine are Nazis!

      …I hate this reality

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      He had meetings with Putin without anyone else present while being president. That alone should disqualify him from holding any public office, let alone becoming president again.

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      The article is more of an exploration of the consequences of the failure of the US to support Ukraine. Not sure why they went with that headline.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    8 months ago

    The article makes is all very obvious but the author is too cowardly to spell it the obvious conclusion: the only one who benefits from all this bullshit is Putin. The only rational explanation is that Trump is acting in Putin’s interest against the US.

  • lostinasea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    At best it’s because it’s because he doesn’t want Joe Biden and the Democrats to look good before the upcoming election. At worst it’s because he’s Putin’s bitch doing whatever his master says. Personally, I believe he’s a piece of shit traitor and so too are all the Republicans that follow and listen to him.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There have been so many examples of Trump protecting and sweet talking Russia and Putin, and he has been surrounded by Russians in all kinds of situations, financial and his security, that there is no reason to believe there are 2 options here. Trump is a traitor to USA, pure and simple.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are a number who aren’t, like Liz Cheney. It’s possible to disagree almost completely with somebody on policy, and still recognize that they’re not a traitor.

      Not that the rest of the Republican party accepts them or will allow them to win a primary anymore.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you’re a longstanding Republican and looking for another home, that’s not a bad idea. If you want the Republicans to lose the next election, you need to actively vote for a Democrat. These three scenarios show why:


          Scenario 1:

          D - 9 votes

          R - 10 votes

          T - 0 votes

          Republican wins


          Scenario 2:

          D - 9 votes

          R - 9 votes

          T - 1 vote

          Tied election, decided by a coin toss


          Scenario 3:

          D - 10 votes

          R - 9 votes

          T - 0 votes

          Democrat wins

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, that line of reasoning can get a bit dicey. Given that they’re in the electoral majority, I think that technically makes the Democrats traitors.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Republicans control a majority of the House of Representatives, giving them the power to block spending. They do what he says.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Why does the article focus on the small minority of Republicans when the rest of the Republicans are complicit in blocking the aid too? Only a few Republicans need to vote in favor of the aid to pass.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the proximate cause. The ultimate cause is that the Republicans stand no chance if they alienate Trump’s base. Many of them would prefer it if he went away but they can’t make it happen.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        AFAIK Democrats had the option to elect a moderate Republican as speaker, but instead they allowed Johnson to be elected. So Democrats could as I see it, have prevented the shitshow the House is now.
        It’s allowed because Democrats failed to prevent it. And instead allowed the MAGA crowd to control the House with their majority among Republicans.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t believe there was some moderate Republican who would have gone along with this

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            OK, maybe I misunderstood, but I’m pretty sure there were Republicans who aired the idea, and Democrats shot it down immediately.
            But maybe it was just media talk IDK?

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              It was pretty much media talk. The Republican Party purged their moderates during the 2022 primary

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There was an interesting news conference with Hakeem Jeffries yesterday where he said that its possible that Democrats might vote to save Johnson if there is a vote to vacate the chair due to putting the Ukraine bill on the floor. Jeffries said specifically its because Johnson hasn’t reneged on any promises yet. It’s clear that Democrats didn’t trust Kevin as far as they could throw him. But they are signaling to Johnson that he might be protected if he did what they wanted.

          To be fair, I think a majority of Republicans also want the Ukraine/Israel deal, too. It’s just the lunatic fringe of the party willing to abandon Ukraine. (I think we know why.)

          Edit: found it

          https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4498643-jeffries-declines-to-take-position-on-saving-speaker-from-conservative-coup/

          The headline says “declines to take a position”, but since his position on McCarthy was “Hell No”, this is still better for Johnson.

          Also:

          Jeffries Suggests Democrats Would Save Johnson From Removal Over Ukraine Aid https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/us/politics/hakeem-jeffries-mike-johnson.html

          That one has more of the quotes about Not Trusting Kevin

        • norbert@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Doing anything to place blame on Democrats instead of the people who actually elected the shitgibbon I see.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because the Republican House Reps listen to him and want to appeal to his political base. And because right-wing news media pushes a ton of Trump-friendly media advocating against further funding of the Ukraine War.

      If you really get under the hood of this thing, the Republican positions is that Americans should be allied with Russia and at war with Ukraine because Ukrainians are gay woke liberal pedophile soyboys, while Russians are Based Western TradCath Chads. What gets even nuttier is that Republicans still despise China, and believe they need to ally with Russia against China in a war over the South Pacific.

      Trump’s not even really leading on this issue so much as echoing what the right-wing press regularly puts out. The real hand behind the throne is a cartel of industrialist billionaire hold-overs from the John Bircher movement of the 1960s, plus their larger network of talk radio, TV, newspaper, and social media talking heads parroting their message.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just remember that turnip was willing to suspend aid for Ukraine unless zelenskyy made a particularly statement supporting his narrative.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    More broadly we should be asking how is this possible, since Trump is not the president.

    It really highlights the weakness of Joe Biden.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It highlights the fact that the Republicans control a majority of the House of Representatives. That’s on the state legislators who gerrymandered the districts

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, because it typically works that way, that just someone has to say something with courage and the weak president is too afraid to say something against it…