• Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It depends on who “we” are.

    If you’re in the US, then bad news buttercup - you’re already under the thumb of a ruthless insane dictator, and the economy is the last of your worries.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    We are heading into a feudal system of a sort. The wealth gap is absolutly massive and the only way to end up in the upper class is to inherit. As per usual the population feels that the system is unfair, but is unable to see the real problem. Media is really pushing far right talking points, as the upper class realizes that the system is broken and a real revolution is a problem. Thats how the US ended up with a de facto monarchy. The UK is moving towards that pretty quickly too.

    The good news is that Labour might make some really usefull changes. Mainly end first past the post to prevent Reform from taking over. That might very well allow left wing parties like the LibDems and Greens to win more seats and change the narrative.

    • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t know if OP is in the USA, but having someone like Donald Trump elected to high office is 100% part of a crash already in progress. Inequality got so bad that democracy is not functioning. In a healthy society, Trump would be an unelectable laughing stock.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah. I consider Trump the “blow everything up” candidate, he got a lot of support from people who were just so generically desperate that they wanted to vote for whoever seemed like they were going to majorly change something, somehow. It almost didn’t matter what Trump did as long as he smashed the existing order while doing it.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          he is doing it, smashing everything to smithereens. the republicans voters hope its phoenix rising out of the ashes type of situation.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        24/7 propaganda, plus MSM helping all along the well, plus adding a little culture war(racisms, sexism, anti-immigration,evangelicalism) helped alot.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, not so fun fact, but this got me curious so I looked up the unemployment rate during The Great Depression: apparently then it was around 20% to 25% as well, so I feel like that reinforces the point I’m making a bit.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        apparently then it was around 20% to 25% as well

        No, the unemployment rate was around 20-25% under the traditional definition. It’s currently 4.2% under that definition.

        If you want to use this LISEP definition, fine, but recognize that it’s been above 30% for most of its existence, and has only been under 25% since COVID. Basically, if you go by the LISEP definition then you’re saying that the job market after COVID has been better than it has ever been before.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I stopped working a year ago. Burnt out, broken down, and various physical ailments just broke and depressed me. Moved back in with family to help support my useless ass. Shit sucks and it ain’t going to get any better. But I’ll turn up to every local protest I can cuz this GOP shit is bullshit.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The 1% own even more stock than they own outright money. You could replace “the economy” in every article with “rich people’s yacht money”. The stock market is 100% dissociated from reality and shouldn’t be used as a measure of general wealth by any means.

    • hobovision@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      From your own source on “true” unemployment, it’s the lowest it has been since they started calculating it. It peaked in 09 at 35% and again in COVID, but all through the early 00s it was between 28% and 30%.

      You can’t use that number as evidence we “already crashed”, because as we’ve seen in other actual crashes it spikes up to 35%.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

        That’s why we see people calculating real unemployment with other variables.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

          U-3 has used the same definition of unemployed since 1940.

          Whatever metric you want to use, you should look at that number and how it changes over time, to get a sense of trend lines. LISEP says the “true” unemployment rate is currently 24.3% in May 2025, which is basically the lowest it’s ever been.

          Since the metric was created in 1994, the first time that it dipped below 25% was briefly in the late 2010’s, right before COVID, and then has been under 25% since September 2021.

          Under this alternative metric of unemployment, the unemployment rate is currently one of the lowest in history.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            I don’t know how to make you engage with reality.

            Slaves arguing for their continued enslavement is just something i will never understand.

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                I didn’t post any numbers.

                “Indignant slave mocks another slave to make themselves feel better.”

                Haha

            • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              The comments you’re responding to are not making that kind of general argument though, they are only talking about whether a specific claim makes sense. If it doesn’t make sense, that doesn’t necessarily mean our economic system is working for us, maybe it means that whatever problems exist would be better quantified in a different way.

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Unemployment statistics do not show an accurate picture of the people who are unemployed based on the definition of unemployed that is used by regular human beings.

                I understand the stat looks good, because the definition of the stat excludes growing groups of people who we would consider unemployed.

                • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Well what I’m seeing in this thread is two metrics, BLS and LISEP, with the argument being that the distinction between them doesn’t matter because unemployment is right now historically low by both measures (I don’t really know the difference between them myself, or whether these are the only meaningful ways to measure it). And you’re reiterating that there exists some measure where it is high, but I think for that to be a convincing counterargument you would need to say more about what that measure is, show that unemployment is high by that measure, and make an argument why that specific way of measuring things is more relevant than the other ones.

            • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              You’re the one saying we shouldn’t be cross comparing different numbers with different meanings… While literally comparing different numbers with different meanings to support your point

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Meh, please don’t quote unusual statistics without giving any context for how to interpet them.

      For this value, it is calculated by:

      Using data compiled by the federal government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, the True Rate of Unemployment tracks the percentage of the U.S. labor force that does not have a full-time job (35+ hours a week) but wants one, has no job, or does not earn a living wage, conservatively pegged at $25,000 annually before taxes.

      24.3% is not that out of the ordinary - you can see historical data back to like, 1995 here.

      Not saying this stat is useless, but the way you’ve chosen to use it is intentionally and inaccurately inflammatory.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        I dunno, H.

        I may be wrong in saying it’s indicative of a crash, and I’m okay with being corrected.

        As to inaccurate or inflammatory, maybe it feels that way if you’re on the winning side of the equation.

        I think we should be inflamed about this. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that thirty years of high functional unemployment being ordinary is an objectively bad thing, but when you couple it with the increasingly supercharged price gouging and inflation the US has experienced over the last several decades, things that seemed improbable before suddenly become feasible. (Like making fascists electable.)

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        The fact that it’s pegged to 25k means that the number is much much higher. It’s not 24.3%. its 24.3% plus everyone who can’t afford to live at today’s prices.

        That’s terrifying.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Maybe in 1995 you could actually afford things while functionally unemployed? I mean, while the relative number is stable, the absolute numbers keep growing, and their situation keeps worsening. Here lies the inflammatory part.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Best way to recover from a spin is push the yoke to straight down and rudder opposite the spin.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The stock market is not the same thing as it was at the start, different players, different motives, and lots of failsafes. That time it was a signal that things were bad, this time we could continue to get worse and you’d never know it looking at the DOW.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        If we look at historic crashes, they had major catalysts causing mass sell orders. Right now markets have had time to adjust because the speed of decline has been very slow.

        Markets are also largely speculative, many stocks are traded way above their fundamental value (think Microsoft, tesla, or coca-cola). These will probably be hit the hard, algorithms will default to what a stock should be and drop hard. But these companies might have the strongest chance to bounce back as well.

        Companies with the strongest books will be safer, but many more risk taking companies won’t be as lucky. This is part of what due diligence of a stock will tell you, but also probably one of the hardest parts of investing.

        As long as decline is slow, stability can be found. But when uncertainty rises fast, so does the unstability of the stock market. Catalysts such as the public losing confidence in banks causing a bank run, companies downsizing at unseen scales to cut costs, or global political instability are possible.

        TLDR: it needs to get way worse, very quickly for the market to crash

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Really weird reading an article that interviews someone you’ve worked for (who is a billionaire themselves).

  • ballgoat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    We are always headed for a crash. That’s the cycle of capitalism without strong regulatory mechanisms to mitigate it. I believe it is every 4-7 years that a crash has happened in the last 300 years.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    Don’t worry. Trump is making sure you can get a job picking crops. You’ll be living in a tent. No rent, not utilities. You’re welcome!

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Brave of you to assume he won’t make people who live/work there pay rent and utilities, and that “the haves” won’t say he’s a great guy for providing this.

      • Hikermick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sarcastic humor aside, migratory agricultural work is a thing in the US. Some of my friends did it back in the 80’s. Live in a tent on site, earn by how much you pick, save money because no rent and no place to spend. No federal taxes. Blueberries here, apples there, travel to where the crops need picking. Clean fish in Alaska or work on the boats.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    Slapping on tariffs at a time with inflation, high consumer anxiety, and wage stagnation is going to be looked on as one of the worst moves a president has made.

  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes. We are heading towards a crash. We are very much already in one, and have absolutley no way out.

    Trump killed all US international commerce with his TACO tariffs and is currently propping up a failing stock market by converting medicaid dollars into ICE / TECH BRO MILITARY funding. The stock market keeps doing great because our tax dollars are propping up companies like Google, Plantir, and Amazon through government grants instead of providing us a safety net. That money will run out eventually, but likely not before more CEOs are killed over it.

    Literally we are living through the gilded 1920’s again but with an American Hitler.

    We now have years of uncontrolled inflation well above target rates, a corrupt government, wealth inequality worse than the French revolution, and rampant unintelligent Tariffs hurting all international trade at the cost of every small business in America. These are the same factors that caused the great depression, and if you think it’s not going to happen again, you are wrong.

    We are a country being lead into disaster by the least competent people imaginable.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      We are heading towards a crash. We are very much already in one, and have absolutley no way out.

      I think this is what folks lose track of when they talk about “the crash”. We’re all waiting with baited breath for the financial system to topple over. But the financial system is increasingly just a dozen private equity firms bidding up one another’s baseball cards. They can’t “crash” in the traditional sense until a sufficient number of them refuse to contribute more to the pot, and so long as everyone has easy credit there’s no real reason to do that.

      Incidentally, JPow and Trump (and every Fed Chair/President going back to Bernenke/Obama) have both been militant in keeping Fed Interest Rates at historic lows going on nearly two decades.

      Literally we are living through the gilded 1920’s again but with an American Hitler.

      I mean, the parallels between Trump and Coolidge Eras are in abundance. War on Immigration. A finance/tech sector that’s eating the industrial economy. Massive spike in white nationalism paired with a full blown Red Scare. Deficit hawkery that never touches the national security state. Global ecological crises compounding into massive famines and agricultural failures.

      We are a country being lead into disaster by the least competent people imaginable.

      Part of the problem is that we’ve lost track of a consensus on what “competent” looks like. I see plenty of people (rightly) insist guys like Trump and Speaker Johnson and governors like DeSantis and Abbott are criminally incompetent. But then these same people get fully behind Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg and Kamala Harris, seemingly without recognizing that they’re pushing the backside of the same privatization / national security state coin.

      What do you do when blue state bastions like California and New Mexico are turning out Crypto Shills as quickly as any captured conservative enclave like Wyoming or South Carolina? What does competency look like in the wake of Biden’s squandered four years or Obama’s or Clinton’s corporately compromised time in office, for that matter?

      How do you talk about climate change or even scratch the surface of our US-backed genocides in Gaza and Yemen and Afghanistan or talk about housing policy or college debts or union organization when half the elected liberal contingent is just a commodity that’s traded on the stock market?

      We’re all waiting for the dream to end in a sudden shocking economic turn. I don’t know if that’s necessarily what will happen. What if we’ve just pivoted our economy towards a monetization of human suffering? What if this system is stable and enduring? There is no crash because there’s nothing left to be broken into and fleeced.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Competency implies having some qualification other than loyalty, listening to subject matter experts, considering consequences. The result of competency could easily be just a matter of degree and awareness.

        For example, tariffs can be a powerful tool for addressing specific trade inequities or supporting local production, especially in conjunction with other tools. Many US administrations have successfully used them. Only an incompetent buffoon would just throw them down everywhere all at once as the only tool, or as a bullying tactic.

    • meowgenau@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      wealth inequality worse than the French revolution

      When the creator of the Revolutions podcast was asked about the one theme that follows every revolution, he said that it was wealth inequality.

      If I remember correctly, the French revolution had three major elements that kicked it off the way it did: huge wealth inequality, a major event that hits the lower classes (in this case a drought that destroyed lots of crops and therefore caused a wheat shortage), and incompetent leadership that is unable to deal with said event. Looks like the US is getting there, step by step.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    And I just found out I need a new job as we are being ordered into the office after they moved it 50 miles away.

    Things are not looking good. I think they will hit us with another round of redundancies after some people leave too.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Scrolling through indeed right now, its not great. Maybe just give up trying to find anything I have skills for and find something unskilled?

        But I think my contract states once a month in the office so if I can argue that its probably worth staying and just going through a shit commute once a month. Still not great but probably slightly better than taking a local retail job.

    • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’ve been WFH since Covid forced it, but then a year ago the promised us WFH full time was here to stay and only those that needed or wanted to be in the office could. They downsized buildings and everything. Nice!

      They just told us we all had to be back in the office in a month. There isn’t enough offices, not enough parking, we’ve blown away all the productivity metrics at home, half the company is out of state. But, uh, REASONS! We must have butts in THIS specific chair or work doesn’t count.

      There is literally no valid reason to force it. I think it’s all about control and power. They really don’t care about productivity or employee satisfaction at all, they just want to force everyone to comply. If they wanted either of those other things we’ve proved what works.

      I hate it. It feels like the dumb “open office” fad all over again. Let’s cram 200 people into a single giant open noisy room. Employees HATED it. Managers all gloated how innovative they were. Then it faded away again as they all slowly accepted that no one gets anything done in that chaotic environment.

      So too with office vs home. We live in a digital age. The computer age. The internet age. Long gone is the age of work being done by shaking hands and looking at a binder of papers. It’s an email, zoom call and a pdf now. Accept it.

      In a weird way I’m actually looking forward to my company all going back with 0 coherent plan and not enough parking or desks and then I’ll giggle as productivity and morale absolutely tanks.

      It’s also very likely they know a certain % will quit over it and do it on purpose to lay off without having to. The only problem is that all the most experienced and qualified people leave first.

      Companies have had 5 years to accept reality, sell off the MASSIVELY expensive offices and stay fully remote where possible, but no, I think they want control over profits. They want to FEEL like they are managing instead of actually managing.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        constructive dismissial, create a situation where it becomes untenable to stay at your job, eg far away location limit office space, so people resign. seems like it has been ogoing since '23. one of my bros was in tech, they just got impatient and straight up laid people off at the mid size tech company, gotta gid rid of people who are earning 200-400k/year to record profits. he hasnt found another job yet, and i detect a distinct hint of a late 30s life crisis too.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh I absolutely expect morale to tank. We barely have parking at all, the office is large enough for about 25% of the company, the parking is enough for 5% of the seats in the office.

        I am hoping I can get it down to once a month, at that point its no worse than commuting into town for retail every day as far as total commuting time each month. The pay I get is barely over minimum wage so that is hardly a benefit compared to retail. Full WFH is pretty much the only benefit that is worth anything.

        Then at once a month hopefully avoid coming in for a few of them. Plan holiday for the days we were going to be in, that kind of thing.

        • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, honestly once a month isn’t that bad. Annoying because you MUST do it, but like you said, not so bad. I’ve done once a week and it feels ok ish. Like, I can’t get ANYTHING done in the office anymore. It’s too distracting, too many meetings, and as opposed to being at home, I now have to commute, get lunch, etc. And when in meetings in person you can’t really keep working, but a zoom call, yeah I can get half my work done while sitting through all the meetings all day, but not now and I’m not about to go into unpaid overtime to make up their awful decision. And I’m not going to log on early or stay late either. Done with all that. You get your 8 hours, no more now. So I’m sorta looking forward to sitting around in meetings all day discussing all the things we could be working on.

          That would be hilarious if you took PTO that 1 day every month. Amazing. Come in like, one time per year just to make a point that you didn’t skip them ALL. Hahaha.

          Honestly though, if your pay isn’t that great keep looking and bail asap.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      its called constructive dismissal learn that when they were doing the very first round of layoffs in '23, from reddit.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The US could poke along forever, North Korea style because our entire country is full of cowards who will just take oppression without any fight.

    …the climate, tho. 😬

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    More of a slow collapse than a crash. Ever seen a dilapidated house on a country road, parts of the roof caving in, paint chipped, vines covering the yard? We’re working on being that house by slowly letting social and physical infrastructure in the US collapse over time.