• @ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    MUH AY-EI

    Did he replace his brain with AI already? Because it sure fucking looks like it.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        His greatest achievement has been buying contracts that state he has invented things that he didn’t invent.

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    Dude’s brain is shit design and fucking sucks, actually

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    If a fighter jet is within visual range of a camera, it’s already too late. And that’s if there aren’t any clouds.

    • @Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      your not thinking like a musk, not if the government pays the subscription and contract for his early warning camera drone balloon swarm thing or something something they could run on ketamine or something.

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    Looks like being rich and surrounding yourself with yes-people is the #1 cause of sitting confidently at the top of the Dunning-Krueger curve.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    That fucker really thinks he’s so smart when all he does is constantly demonstrate what an idiot he is.

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    For those doing the maths at home:

    An F35 who obligingly flies top-towards-you (not exactly something you can do, but hey, maybe they’re turning) is all of 10m tall.

    An AIM-120C can very comfortably hit a target at 100km.

    At that range, the F-35 takes up 26 arcseconds, or 0.007 degrees. That’s roughly about the size of this period, at a distance of 3 meters away.

    [ . ]

    Good luck spotting that in a sky of roughly the same colour, full of other objects.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      and then also dealing with the F-35 itself, even if you managed to lock on and target it, it will have anti-warfare capabilities you have to contend with.

    • Miles O'Brien
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Pffffffff

      I can see that bright white dot against the dark mode background on my maximum brightness screen with ease! Therefore your argument is invalid!

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Magnifying glass makes things bigger, checkmate! 🔍🔍

    • @chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Just for reference: JWST has an optical resolution of 0.07 arcseconds. It’s a mirror 22 feet in diameter though, not something you’d put inside a missile guidance package.

          • @reinei@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            Well but I am!

            Although, we would still need to get it back here… Okay so first we send two more rockets after it! One to return it on and one with the/a human engineer on board to pack it back up.

            I mean we can hardly have it return while unpacked. That would damage the delicate heat baffles! And we need those to shield it from the rockt engine at the back of our missile so it doesn’t start targeting itself because it no longer knows where it is/isn’t…

      • @RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Holy shit. I just realised that the reason they’re building the ELT is so they can mount it on a missile and shoot down an F-35 at some point.

    • @jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      You can place cameras anywhere, they don’t need to be right next to what is being targeted. Nearer ranges will allow AI to misidentify at much higher rates than max standoff ranges of an AIM-120C.

    • @Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Yeah, sure. But that doesn’t matter if you point the AI at it with a really good zoom lens, though. And then you have a ton of them, pointed in an directions, like the compound eye of a fly. F35 spotted.

  • @JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    Well if we’re on shitting on his character. This man had the opportunity to change the approach to implementing neuralink tech to make it less destructive but instead chose to continue with their direction. A direct competitor has since proven that there was no need to be so invasive.

    • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      I’m glad it’s been officially proven by a competitior. I’ve been shouting that since articles came out about the first human test subject. All of that invasive surgery, issues with the brain tissue pushing out some of the wires, and the best denonstrable result is that he can use a computer mouse with his mind?

      There are so many damn options for accessibility with computer control (even mouse control) that don’t involve invasive brain surgery, and we know that we can monitor brain activity pretty clearly through sensors on the scalp.

  • @whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    “Théoden no longer recognizes friend from foe. Not even his own kin. Saruman has poisoned the mind of the king and claimed lordship over this land. My company are those loyal to Rohan. And for that, we are banished.” - Èomer, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

  • @Killer57@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    I mean, in comparison to some of the F-22 variants, the F-35 is a pretty big piece of shit.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      That VERY much depends on mission requirements. The F35 has issues, but calling it a big piece of shit shows that you’re an internet troll who has no idea what it’s talking about

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        No, the designers will tell you the same. It’s a compromise, it’s not perfect at anything but it’s very good at most of it’s intended purposes. It’s that old addage don’t let perfect be the enemy of great.

        Don’t get me wrong I still think it’s smiling idiot twin is the cooler plane.

    • @Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      It is especially important to understand that Tesla’s struggles with navigation are entirely a result of Elon refusing to equip them with LiDAR. This isn’t some “The tech is really new and really complicated and we’re still figuring it out” problem. There is a very good solution to most collision avoidance scenarios, but Elon refuses to let them use it because he’s an idiot.

    • SomeAmateur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Speaking of fire trucks has anyone here ever read the emergency response procedures for teslas in severe accidents? When I was a volunteer we gave it a look over.

      If I remember right, Depending on the model they recommend 8000 gallons (~30k liters) to keep an overheating battery’s temp stable. I’ll link a pdf here.

      Our engine holds 700 gallons (5.2k liters) and the typical tanker in our area holds 2000 (7.5k liters)

      That’s a house fire level response for a single electric vehicle. Just getting that much water moved to a scene would be challenging. We have tankers, but how many city departments can move that much water? You don’t see hydrants on highways. The future will be interesting for firefighters

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      Someone died because one of those cars thought the broadside of a white semi trailer was the sky and drove under it