• Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Mr richest man on earth with tesla and space x doesn’t even have an electric private jet

  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO BUILD THIS WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS, ELON.

    IN A CAVE YOU FUCKING INBRED. A CAVE!!!

  • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Also… Fighters are fast, the point is you should fire the missile before you see it.

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      The f-35 is built for engagements outside the horizon, like, the target is blocked by the curvature of the earth.

      Light sensitive cameras and rudimentary AI…

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Pssh, all you need is a gravity lens to bend the light, problem solved!

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          So we use a black hole to bend space time and look into the past where it isn’t. We know where it isn’t in the past.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    For those doing the maths at home:

    An F35 who obligingly flies top-towards-you (not exactly something you can do, but hey, maybe they’re turning) is all of 10m tall.

    An AIM-120C can very comfortably hit a target at 100km.

    At that range, the F-35 takes up 26 arcseconds, or 0.007 degrees. That’s roughly about the size of this period, at a distance of 3 meters away.

    [ . ]

    Good luck spotting that in a sky of roughly the same colour, full of other objects.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Pffffffff

      I can see that bright white dot against the dark mode background on my maximum brightness screen with ease! Therefore your argument is invalid!

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah, sure. But that doesn’t matter if you point the AI at it with a really good zoom lens, though. And then you have a ton of them, pointed in an directions, like the compound eye of a fly. F35 spotted.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      You can place cameras anywhere, they don’t need to be right next to what is being targeted. Nearer ranges will allow AI to misidentify at much higher rates than max standoff ranges of an AIM-120C.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Just for reference: JWST has an optical resolution of 0.07 arcseconds. It’s a mirror 22 feet in diameter though, not something you’d put inside a missile guidance package.

          • reinei@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Well but I am!

            Although, we would still need to get it back here… Okay so first we send two more rockets after it! One to return it on and one with the/a human engineer on board to pack it back up.

            I mean we can hardly have it return while unpacked. That would damage the delicate heat baffles! And we need those to shield it from the rockt engine at the back of our missile so it doesn’t start targeting itself because it no longer knows where it is/isn’t…

      • RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Holy shit. I just realised that the reason they’re building the ELT is so they can mount it on a missile and shoot down an F-35 at some point.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      and then also dealing with the F-35 itself, even if you managed to lock on and target it, it will have anti-warfare capabilities you have to contend with.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Jesus christ … this dude is a fucking moron… if it WAS easy defense companies would be doing it already… and guess what, they aren’t. Between this dickhead and Captain Brainworm the next four years are gonna SUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKKKK!!!

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Dude’s brain is shit design and fucking sucks, actually

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    If a fighter jet is within visual range of a camera, it’s already too late. And that’s if there aren’t any clouds.

    • Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      your not thinking like a musk, not if the government pays the subscription and contract for his early warning camera drone balloon swarm thing or something something they could run on ketamine or something.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      He has Tesla’s “Full Self Driving” system, which works with AI and cameras.
      He probably wants to just upload his software to US fighter jets for, say, $20 million per unit.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        It might actually cost way more than that, changing the jet’s balance and attaching things to them requires major modifications, but him selling the the systems for that alone sounds about right.

        Maybe the real plan is to intentionally fuck it up and weaken the US Military. Wouldn’t put it past the Trump admin.

    • jas0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Sucking up to Putin. The next thing he will say is all 2 su57s in existence are much more advanced.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Looks like being rich and surrounding yourself with yes-people is the #1 cause of sitting confidently at the top of the Dunning-Krueger curve.

  • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Assuming this is OC, next time do a little better at cropping and scaling. Ypu move that plane to the far right under yhe arrow and youve got 2/3 of the blank canvas to work with. I don’t expect much effort on meme post especially NDC but I would like to actually be able to read the tweets without zooming in and theres enough white space to scale them up.