• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    261
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Outdoor cat: “today I killed 300 birds and permanently altered the local ecosystem”

    Indoor cat: “hehe I shit in a box”

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      8 months ago

      And so begins a new battle in the eternal war between Americans with indoor cats and others with outdoor cats.

      It’s pretty difficult to actually find an indoor cat in the UK. In the US it’s common.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        108
        ·
        8 months ago

        Of course it is difficult to find an indoor cat, you only see them inside a house.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I guess we in Finland are Americand now lol

        We’re more worried about the cats wellbeing though than the birds.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which is fitting because, in the end, when the hell have the British cared about the fallout of anything they do

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Lol American is the fallout of you people sending all your crazy religious fucks across the ocean and hoping for the best

            • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              To be fair I wouldn’t say we ‘sent them’ more that they left because they couldn’t oppress people as much as they wanted.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Heeeyy! We just kicked them out, we didn’t know they’d go and start a new country overseas!

              We honestly should have killed them there and then, nip it in the bud.

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            It was a light hearted joke about the British that clearly hit a little close to home considering your rage.

            • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re literally crying about animals killing other animals. Stupid, non-verbal animals that function on instinct.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                … Which is why you need to keep them inside, because when they are outside they act on instinct.

                12 year olds understand this. Where are you stuck? Is it because I didnt use large colorful pictures? Are words with 5+ letters the problem?

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not so sure both about Americans having their cats indoors, and “others” having it the opposite way. I have never been to the UK or the US, but most owners I had seen kept their cats indoors. Except for Georgia (the country), where cats seem to be treated as some sort of weed that grows on it’s own

        • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Except for Georgia (the country), where cats seem to be treated as some sort of weed that grows on it’s own

          I like this phrasing. I’d love to hear more about how you came to this conclusion.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            There are a lot of strays around at first sight, but then I found out that at least about a third of them have owner/owners because they sometimes stick to several places. A lot of people also care for the strays and check them for issues not taking 'em home, some initiatives are doing neutering and finding homes for treated cats.

            I heard it’s somewhat similar in Türkiye, everyone loves cats but mostly don’t want to care about them above feeding them when met. Don’t know if outdoor cats are popular there, though

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nope. And the RSPB doesn’t believe cats are a concern:

          The UK’s largest bird charity, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), is not particularly concerned about the impact of cats on the British mainland.

          https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/14/cats-kill-birds-wildlife-keep-indoors

          And a Bristol study found cats kill the “doomed” weak and sick birds - not healthy birds: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00836.x

          • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Cats have also been around in the UK significantly longer than many other places. Here in Hawaii they’re a plague on native species that had no such predators before.

            • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s a big part of the difference. Cats in the old world are probably fine since everything there has evolved alongside them. But the native species in the Americas haven’t had housecats to worry about until relatively recently in evolutionary terms.

              • jpeps@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m a outdoor cat person but in fairness one issue to consider is that while cats are natural in Europe, their current numbers and general location are something that’s pretty unnatural. I definitely err on the side of not being concerned about it, but I do think it’s something to consider as people have more pets.

                Personally I have one cat that has brought in a single frog, and another that exclusively brings in recycling.

            • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah but Hawaii’s ecosystem is different from the mainland, too. Every area is going to handle this differently.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The UK used to have a different feline species that was native to the isles.

            Its likely going extinct because of the UK obsession with outdoor cats.

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Since 2017, the Cat Classification Task Force of the Cat Specialist Group recognizes Felis silvestris silvestris as the valid scientific name for all European wildcat populations, arguing that it is doubtful that the Scottish wildcat is sufficiently distinct to accord it separate subspecific status.

              It’s just a plain old cat, it’s not going extinct.

          • thehatfox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, according to the RSPB habitat destruction from expanding urban areas and farmland is the main threat to bird life in the UK.

            When my family had a cat it would mostly catch and bring home earthworms.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        And thats why the wild felines are going extinct in the british isles.

        Ay, but tradition right? Fuck the natives, as is british tradition

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah the British really do have a history of royally fucking over whole eco systems. Brought rabbits to Australia thinking they would be a good food source.

          Except they bred like well rabbits. And destroyed whole eco systems. So the British imported foxes to eat the rabbits. Except literally every other native species is easier for a fox to kill than a fast rabbit.

          Fucking morons.

          • Badger@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s a bit of a harsh take considering it was one guy on the 19th century who didn’t know better. Looking at it he brought 13 rabbits for his private estate - I don’t think the science was there for extended Environmental Impact Studies back then - just some rich guy making a minor change to his place having unintended consequences so branding an entire country as fucking morons is a bit much.

            • veroxii@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Okay. One English guy was a fucking moron with regards to rabbits. Plenty others were morons for other things in Australia.

              • Badger@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Awesome, glad that’s settled, just a minor blip on what would be Australia’s impeccable record of care for both indigenous creatures, and indigenous people.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Where I live you’re not supposed to let the cats roam free because it’s dangerous to them and they can get ran over, get diseases, hurt themselves without you being able to do anything etc.

        I guess the local ecosystem is a plus but it’s mostly for the cat’s benefit afaik.

      • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Indoor cats are generally healthier, if you give them enough enrichment. I live in a tiny little house but my cat has boxes to hide in, toys to play with, multiple spots to look out windows, etc. She won’t get sick or injured as much as an indoor/outdoor cat and will probably live longer.

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      Our 3 cats kill maybe a total of 5 birds and 10 mice a year. They can’t reproduce and prefer to stay inside for most of the year. They’re not a problem, as many new studies have found out. At least in northern Germany. It might be a bigger problem elsewhere though. Just trying to point out that your criticism may only apply to certain areas.

      • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s what you know they have killed. Who knows how much more. They also still get hit by cars, mauled by dogs, attacked by other cats, piss and shit in other people’s yards.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That you know of. I’m a bird lover, I’ve got my biases, admittedly. But no, cats seem to put a very heavy strain on the local bird population.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      More like “today someone left food out for me as usual so I didn’t hunt like I would if I were starving”.

      70% of bird deaths are from fetal and stray cats, not just “outdoor” cats.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 months ago

        30% of bird deaths is still a lot of bird deaths. I would much prefer if cats were only responsible for 40 small animal extinctions rather than the 60 or so that they’ve caused so far

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Not to mention a lot of those “strays” are just the offspring of someone’s unneutered outdoor cat.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      103
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Not how cats work. Nice job getting butthurt about a funny comic on the internet, though.

      And just so you can be better informed in the future. Feral cats are the ones affecting the ecosystem. Outdoor house cats have a negligible influence on wildlife. Let your cat go outside sometimes.

      And, just a guess, you should probably go outside sometimes too.

      "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

      Downvoting doesn’t make you right and it doesn’t make your cats less miserable.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thats exactly how cats work.

        The comic is funny and cute, but dont get it twisted. The science is pretty firm on the destructive effects of invasive domestic cats.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          50
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

          Maybe don’t believe every sensationalized social media article that’s really just a barely disguised cat litter ad.

          “The science is pretty firm” lmao

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            50
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            Im a professional ecologist. I have to listen to one of my colleagues rant about this topic on a nearly weekly basis, because its the focus of her grant work.

            There are multiple groups of actual researchers in nearly every institute of biological study on the planet dedicated to spreading local awareness about wild cats.

            There are multiple websites entirely dedicated to trying to inform people that the small apex predator from a far off desert doesnt actually belong wandering the wilds of your neighborhood.

            There are a few actual native species of wild felines currently threatened due to feral domestic cats, that are having trouble becoming stable again because of folk like you.

            The kind of person who doesnt really grok that owned cats are where feral cats come from, because your cat is fucking left and right in the bushes.

            The kind of person who thinks their cat can win a fight with a car, or coyote, or wolf, or fox, or badger, or weasel, or any other predator in the wild that youre gleefully feeding it to.

            The kind of person who is to blame for multiple feline diseases spreading and festering in local populations because you let your cat go pick them up from the source and spread them about willy nilly.

            The kind of person who failed to pay attention in grade school science.

            But please. Go on, tell me how the majority of science is a pop article about cat litter, flunkie.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                30
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I mean… I know Im not lying, and my comments are repeating the current standard. So either you retired 4 decades ago, or youre about as successful an ecologist as you are a conversationalist.

                Letting your cat outdoors means its interacting with wild populations. That makes it succeptable to the same problems. An ecologist would know this.

                A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors, so thats a confirmed lie. But at least its not breeding, yes.

                Wildcats are often refered to as apex predators in their native environments, because they dont live near all those predators. But piddling over the exact definition of apex doesnt really stop your cat becoming a coyote meal.

                This basic concept is a grade school science lesson. If you dont know algebra, why would I assume you took calculus classes?

                Some of us, sure. I dont think youre part of that collective group though.

                For starters, Ive never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife, or who completely ignores the massive issue of feline disease spreading.

                E: I just noticed your edit, on apex predation. Do you genuinely think that cats cannot be an ecological threat to small mammal, reptile, and amphibian populations just because they can be eaten by larger locals? By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats… Thats insanely fucked up.

                • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats… Thats insanely fucked up.

                  And something an actual ecologist would have thought of, as you are essentially considering your pet cat as part of the food web, a high school level ecological concept.

                • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  36
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  “Never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife.”

                  “A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors.”

                  Dude. You’re clearly not an ecologist, just some loudmouth repeating sensationalist, unfounded, unresearched pseudoscience. Just stop.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you’re a professional ecologist, then you should know full well that even if a cat is perfectly sedentary and kills nothing, and is neutered, they can still get and spread diseases, they can still get run over, and they can still be attacked and killed by other outdoor animals

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                You can put anything you like in quotes, it’s not cited. As a “professional ecologist” you’d habitually cite your sources

              • Alteon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you don’t think outdoor cats, not just feral cats, are destroying the ecosystem, then you’re not only an ignorant ecologist, but a fucking dangerous one. God only knows what other goody-ass looney tunes theories you have. Not only are you misinformed, but you go so far as to defend and spread that misinformation. Jfc.

              • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Well some us have actual educations, with degrees and everything.

                The argument is based on hearsay, personal experience, and this flimsy excuse for authority.

                Troll, or insane person?

              • trolske@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                As a “professional ecologist” you should be aware of the concept of “landscape of fear”.
                Non-consumptive effects have an equally strong (some argue an even stronger) effect on prey populations compared to consumptive effects.
                Letting domesticated cats roam freely creates an unnaturally high predation pressure in the area and has more effects on the local wildlife than just killing it.

      • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nice job getting butthurt

        Your other comment drivel makes the irony here quite palpable. It’s delicious.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

          • ALQ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You keep posting this without citing a source, which doesn’t help your argument. Please provide a source for this quote.

              • ALQ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                27
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you want anyone to take your argument seriously, then you do the opposite of thinking for others - you provide your sources so your audience can review and then think for themselves based on the data. Otherwise you’re just expecting people to take your word for it, which means you would be doing all of the thinking for the people who don’t question which, based on your comment, is not what you want.

                Thank you for providing the source.

              • Signtist@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                24
                ·
                8 months ago

                This study is about the immense magnitude of cat predation, and your takeaway is that we shouldn’t limit owned cat predation simply because un-owned cat predation is higher…

                We estimate that cats in the contiguous United States annually kill between 1.3 and 4.0 billion birds (median=2.4 billion) (Fig. 1a), with ∼69% of this mortality caused by un-owned cats. The predation estimate for un-owned cats was higher primarily due to predation rates by this group averaging three times greater than rates for owned cats.

                This study estimates that annual bird deaths by owned cat predation in the US is around a 750 million median figure, and you’re just fine with that?

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                If you quote an authority source you are obligated to cite it. It is not other’s job to backwards full-text-search a quote to determine who your were referencing. Pretty common academia stuff, but as you said you’re an ecologist and for sure know that, so you must have omitted it purposefully

          • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It kind of sounds like this is part of a paper that is detailing seemingly large amounts of predation from cats of which the majority is attributable to un-owned cats which I gather you reckon means “outdoor” owned cats aren’t a big threat to wildlife populations since they aren’t responsible for the greatest amount of the total predation from cats overall.

            But, without the context, the numbers cited sound instinctively like ‘big’ numbers so if the total magnitude of predation from cats is large and “owned” cats are responsible only for a fraction of it, their contribution could well be substantial nonetheless. Not knowing the scope or the details of the quoted paper it’s unclear if it goes in to what the estimated proportion is other than not the majority and its unclear how much predation can be tolerated by the populations upon which cats, both owned and unowned, prey.

            For example maybe owned cats are responsible for 40% of the total predation by cats on local wildlife in an area with the remaining 60% being attributable to un-owned cats. This would make un-owned cats majority responsible for the predation yet you could reduce the total predation by 40% if owned cats were all kept indoors in that hypothetical. The actual numbers are likely different and could well be much more slanted between owned vs un-owned cats’ share of predation but if the estimates for the sustainable amount of predation certain populations can withstand are below the current total amount of predation then removing even a smaller fraction might be the difference between endangerment and extinction.

            • Devi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Exactly this, as Signtist posted above, about 31% of deaths are predicted to be from owned cats which is around 750 million birds per year. That’s horrific.

              Cats, even owned ones, have cause extinctions

    • Slovene@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not to mention all the outdoor cats that are themselves killed or horribly injured.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know a guy who went through 5 cats in a few months because he was getting them, letting them out, and they were getting hit by cars since he lives on a super busy road that has heavy semi traffic.

        It really reminds me of that one joke “I keep having to buy a new car because my neighbors dog keeps eating it” " it sounds like you’re just feeding cats to the neighbors dog"

        Dude just didn’t seem to grasp simple addition that his new cat + outside in a bad area = squish

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The only cat I’ve had that I’ve felt okay with letting roam was a stray that came to us declawed, so he was mostly harmless. We still ended up making him an inside cat because we caught him sneaking into the neighbor’s house to steal their cat’s food and poop in its litterbox.

          • Thrashy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not a lot of coyotes in our neck of the woods, but the little orange moron kept writing checks with the neighbor cats that his disarmed front paws couldn’t cash, so he was always coming back with scratches. One of the other reasons we stopped letting him out.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Is that how that works though? I don’t know anything about Coyotes, but I know things generally know better than to fuck with cats.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  … Are you asking if a coyote can eat a cat?

                  Do you understand they hunt deer? Theyre not really worried about a cat with clawless arthritis, horn and hoof wounds are much bigger threats.

                  Predators dont know better than to not fuck with cats, most of them know to grab them before they get up a tree.

          • Thrashy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            I would never do it to a cat, but when this particular one wandered into my then-girlfriend’s house one night and decided he lived there, he was already declawed. He never seemed to suffer too badly from it, fortunately.

        • Slovene@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          But what if he was a guest there? Maybe the neighbour’s cat told him “make yourself at home?” Did you even ask him? Psh …

          • Thrashy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            We actually found out when my wife was over visiting, and he came in through the cat door, locked eyes with her, froze, and slowly backed out of the house. 😅

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      Absolute environmental disaster, they need to be spayed and neutered and occasionally culled by any competent local government.

      • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’ll also need to ban pet cats from walking outside without a leash. Our cats were neutered, didn’t stop them from killing any mice or birds they could get their paws on.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The reason they need to be spayed and neutered instead of outright killed is because culls don’t really work on animals that reproduce that quickly. Whenever a spot opens up for another cat to make its territory, it gets immediately claimed. There are a ton of research papers that show spaying and neutering is more effective at lowering stray populations, and that euthanization is more costly on top of being less effective.

          • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I was talking about the cats that are kept as pets, not stray cats. I guess it varies from country to country, but most cats walking around outside in Norway are pets (~90%). Reducing the stray cat population to zero wouldn’t fix the issue of cats killing all the small wildlife unless pet cats are also kept inside.

            I wasn’t saying anything against neutering cats.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If the cat never exits the home then idgaf honestly, but if it escapes then it should be eliminated in the most effective way possible. That is my stance, an unattended cat is a stray for all intents and purposes.

              • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Wow that’s cruel. Someone’s cat gets loose, they can’t find it yet, and you think it should be killed. Good job killing Fluffy because he escaped.

                • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  But letting it slaughter little birds is not cruel, somehow? A manmade pest with no beneficial role to nature is somehow much better to you than functioning ecosystems? If a cat gets out, the owner has made a mistake and will now deal with the consequences.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’d say we take this one step further and declaw, spay, neuter, and keep a lot of people on a leash.

    • summerof69@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      8 months ago

      I miss the internet where people could laugh at a silly comics instead of writing and upvoting this.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mate, we’re old enough now to have to actually fix shit instead of waxing lyrical about our youth. Let’s work together, and still have a laugh.

      • Streetdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re projecting. There is an industry killing billions of animals which is also very bad for the environment and ecosystems. If only they could be as passionate about that as about someone else’s cat…

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Who cares that I club seals? Johnny next door clubs 50 walruses. Sure theyre both going extinct now, but he gets 50 a day! I only get 1!! How could you care that Im clubbing seals with all those dead walruses?”

          • Streetdog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Exactly the poor logic you’d expect from someone who didn’t go to college. Apparently most of Lemmy…

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Im a professional ecologist, there, animal abuser.

              But go on, keep telling me how you failed middle school bio so hard that you know better than the global scientific community

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you get off on animals going extinct? What is wrong with you?

        “Outdoor domestic cats are a recognized threat to global biodiversity. Cats have contributed to the extinction of 63 species of birds, mammals, and reptiles in the wild”

        • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pretty fuckin low on the priority list to be honest. Cats have been doing this forever. Humans are way worse.

          • Grayox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah in their natural habitats, humans are the ones that brought cats with them enabling them to hunt species to extinction. Cats could not have done it without humanity’s help.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Cats are part of the human problem. If you cant reason that bit out, you 100% should not be responsible for another living thing, and probably need regular supervision from an adult to keep you from hurting yourself

            • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              This planets already fucked.

              Compare the damage humans have done to this planet compared to cats, and tell me THAT’S the problem we should be focusing on.

              This planets fucked precisely because people like you worry about the smallest part of the problem possible while championing yourselves as intellectually and morally superior. You’re just stupid.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The cats are part of the damage done by humans.

                This subject is literally my job, dropout. Just because you dont grasp what we teach to children about nature doesnt make the facts suddenly warp to your feelings.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why are you proud of lacking empathy for other living creatures? Are you hollow inside? When will you become part of figuring out a balance, instead of being proud of the problem?

          • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            There’s not a problem. You guys are worried about pet cats killing birds.

            Long list of shit before that’s even remotely on my radar. Get a grip man and realize how privileged you are to sit here complaining about bullshit fuckin problems online.

            • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do you realize how many other places in the universe have birds and cats and whales? They’re our only other companions in a cold, hard universe where so much can go wrong.

              As such, I care a lot more about flora and fauna than mere human achievements and the problems that have resulted; while I’m proud of my species we also need to protect life in our respective little corners. That starts by not letting cats outdoors, and that’s a fact.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Realistically, outdoor cats don’t travel much. They just hang out in their neighborhood, chill in their favorite spots, etc.

    Cats have their territory and that’s where they spend their time, doing cat things. It’s just that an outdoor cat’s territory isn’t limited by walls.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There was a BBC documentary a few years ago where they gave GPS tracking collars to a bunch of cats in a neighbourhood and tracked where they went. Each of the cats had their own territory and favourite locations.

      • vojel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think I watched this one and also a German documentary. It even showed that elderly cats roam way less then younger ones. Pretty interesting.

      • jpeps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I loved that doc! It was fascinating seeing the vast differences in territory. I remember one cat who travelled something like a mile back and forth every day on a really narrow area. There was also a pair of cats that had worked out a little territory share amongst themselves, patrolling the same area but always 12 hours apart from each other.

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I cannot imagine having an indoor/outdoor cat. I’d worry so much about them while they were away. And if they just disappeared and didn’t return…I don’t know how I could stand it.

    We have 3 indoor-only cats. Obviously I’m pretty attached to them.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      the most i’ve ever done is let my first cat go on the deck on a leash and even then i panicked the whole time. one time she got out of the slider at night and i couldn’t handle it thankfully she came back like an hour or so later

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      I really understand that fear, and I do experience that with my outdoor cats. However cats tend to stick to their established territory and patterns and at least for mine, never go far and barely ever out of sight. In the summer being outdoor cats pretty much just means they sleep all day curled up in the garden.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I can’t do it. We have fox around, and plenty of community cats (one evening, I walked down the ravine looking for our dog after he ran off, and I shined my flashlight upward to see about 6 pairs of eyes staring at me). We had a cat get some sort of blood borne disease, we think she got it from a tick that was in the house when we moved in (it’s our only theory, we have no idea what actually happened), and she spent a few days in the animal hospital, and barely survived. (It also cost several thousand dollars.) Unfortunately she passed away from multiple medical issues a few years later. :(

        (We adopted another cat after she passed - we’ve never had more than 3 at once.)

        • jpeps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sorry to hear about your cat! I’m assuming you’re in the states, and I’d agree that I don’t think I’d let a cat outside there. One extra bit of support in the UK is that it’s pretty unheard of to not routinely vaccinate your cats to protect against random diseases, but of course it can’t cover everything.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I am. We always vaccinate our cats as well, and since that incident we give them regular flea and tick preventatives (well, two of them for the flea and tick - the third one is way too skittish to let us do that). In our case, there’s always a risk the dog brings something in, too, so it’s good to do.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Outdoor cats in the UK are driving your native wildcats extinct. Even if we ignore that the cat population is bringing foxes and badgers into human settlements because they make easy free meals.

            You arent immune to having invasive species. In fact the british are pretty directly responsible for a lot of invasive species problems globally, so I would think yall would grasp the concept by now.

            • jpeps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Wildcat extinction is an extremely specific issue. Wildcats only exist in Scotland now, driven to near extinction mostly by humans, not mating with other cats. This happened literally hundreds of years ago and has practically nothing to do with house cats. Now interbreeding is an issue for the preservation of the small number of wildcats left in Scotland. It’s sad but hardly a concern for keeping cats in most areas of the UK.

              Secondly, I do ignore that cats are ‘bringing in foxes and badgers’. Can you present a source on this? I couldn’t find anything.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Sure, hand wave an extinction because its inconvenient.

                Do you actually need me to google uk cat death counts for you? Or do you think predators entering human settlements is normal?

                Did you guys not recently have a “serial cat murderer” who was just a fox leaving its kills in public places? Do you think thats a normal thing?

                • jpeps@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  How am I hand waving it? I’m stating an obvious truth. What impact on wildcats do you expect to come from cats in Cornwall, Ipswich, or Manchester?

                  I think you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Yes, I would like you to google cat death counts and show me any evidence for what you’re saying. I wouldn’t be surprised at all to find that cats sometimes get killed by other animals, but to suggest that it’s a significant cause of death or that they’re the reason that foxes are coming to ‘human settlements’ is complete nonsense. You make it sound like packs of badgers roam the streets of London at night.

                  Foxes in cities are very normal. They’re basically the UK’s raccoon. They scavenge things, including the bodies of cats hit by cars.

    • Umbraveil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sometimes, you gotta do what’s best for your cat. We have one that just couldn’t handle being indoors full-time. We put a Tractive GPS tracker on his collar. It gives peace of mind and if anything happens, at least we’ll know when to find him. He’s living his best cat life.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      Never seen any cat that chose to stay inside even 50% of the time when given a choice. I’d rather they enjoy their life than make me feel better be cause they’re penned up all the time.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        we have an indoor cat. I was worried about it so started taking it outside. It would sprint back inside.

        So then I took it out and closed the door. It clawed at the door.

        I picked her up and moved her off the deck. She bolted under the deck and I had to take up one of the boards to get her out and she ran back inside faster than ever.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        My cats come and go as they please, one spends about 90% of her time indoors, the other mostly nights, but is gone during daytime. I usually see her when I walk my dog, she’ll creep up from behind a bush and finish the walk with us, come in for a snack and then be gone again.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Far better to die young under a car tire, bleeding out slowly and painfully alone on the asphalt. Totally agree, way better than living your entire lifespan.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          … in a gilded prison, never really have lived a single day in their entire lives.

          Yeah, I’d take my chances with the tire.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If your house is a gilded prison to your pets, youre a shit pet owner and you shouldnt own any animal of any kind.

            Like sorry bud, you can give a small mammal a fulfilling life inside your house pretty fuckin easy. Harness training a cat is so straight forward, too, so its not even a life permanently indoors.

            I get youre probably so fuckin lazy that you would prefer your pet gets its guts ripped out and dies slow in the worst pain of its life. But any normal adult capable of washing their ass can do better than you, so maybe you leave the big boy responsibilities to better people.

  • willis936@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    A stranger outdoor cat just walked with me for a few blocks on my way home from a dinner party. It was fun to have a five minute feline friend. It’s sad to know they will very likely die long before my indoor cat of a similar age.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You just made me realize I haven’t seen the sweet ol girl by my buddy’s place in a while and now I’m sad :(

    • nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fwiw my childhood indoor/outdoor cat lived to 19 whereas my indoor only cats got terminal cancer at 13. But generally speaking I believe you are correct.

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    We have 3 indoor/outdoor cats because we’ve just always had indoor/outdoor cats and I never really thought about it.

    Being on more cat-related Reddit and Lemmy communities, I’ve seen more and more of the arguments for keeping cats as indoor-only, and it’s been making me think more about how to care for cats we adopt.

    From what I’ve seen of the discussions, a lot of them seem to center around urban areas and towns, where there’s a high population density. Some arguments also seem to be based off the assumption that the pets aren’t spayed or neutered.

    We live in the middle of nowhere and all our cats are fixed as soon as possible (we’ve had kittens sometimes and they stay inside until then).

    Is there different logic for this situation, or is it the same advice to always keep them indoors?

    I’m genuinely asking.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Obviously there’s the safety aspect of keeping them indoors, they usually live longer. Aside from that, they’re also extremely efficient killing machines. The damage outside cats do to native animal populations is huge.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect the middle of nowhere might be worse given that the wilife there might not see a lot of cats normally and could have more vulnerable populations. Probably depends where you live, but if it has rare wildlife you don’t see much elsewhere your kitty is possibly bad news for them. Also depending on where you live the wildlife can be dangerous for tje cat too. Eagles and snakes are a worry.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unless you live in the native original range for cats, and your local region has zero automobiles, and you have no issue paying vet bills for random illness or parasite infections, then sure. Its probably not that big a risk to let your cat out unsupervised.

      Brits are very arrogantly incorrect about their cat care. They are driving local wildcats extinct, and feeding their pets to local foxes, badgers, and car wheels.

      You can still supplement outdoor time for your cat tho. Harness/leash training isnt too difficult, just go in areas you dont expect dog walkers. And you can also build catios, outdoor spaces that are fenced in.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They are driving local wildcats extinct, and feeding their pets to local foxes, badgers, and car wheels.

        Still better than locking them in a cage and never letting them out

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yo I get youre a shit pet owner, but for those of us who dont need mommy to wipe, giving a pet a fulfilling life is pretty easy.

          Harness training a cat is not hard to people who can be trusted to dress themselves, for example. Sorry to hear you struggle with both.

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think we have coyotes around, but I can only remember 1 or 2 cats disappearing, and I assumed it was because they were old and didn’t want to die inside.

        The “catio” idea people have been bringing up seems like it’s worth a try, but we need to get our deck repaired for that I think.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you have a big enough space and want to make a sun room for human use, Ive seen lots of sun room modifications that make little side slots for cat lounging and climbing.

          And feeders for local wildlife nearby give them free reality tv

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cats are actually in more danger on quiet roads than busy ones. Busy roads teach them that cars will always be there and they avoid them. Quiet roads with infrequent cars they don’t expect them so they get used to crossing without looking or sunning themselves there in the summer.

    • evanuggetpi@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I also live in the middle of nowhere, on 6 hectares of land, and have 4 cats. 2 rescues and 2 ragdolls that had free access to the outdoors. Then a roaming dog killed our chickens, and we were worried it could have got the cats, particularly the ragdolls. Not long after, our beautiful 1 year old tortie was run over. We’re about 400m from the road.

      So now we have a catio and 3 stay indoors. 1 is allowed out because he keeps close to the house.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Outdoor cats are the number one killer of native species. They have contributed to the extinction of numerous species. Not to mention there are coyotes, cougars, bears, and hawks that can harm or even kill your cat. Outdoor cats also are a vector for diseases and parasites that can seriously harm them, or humans.

      Pets should be kept indoors, for their safety, for the safety of the environment, and for your safety.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Three factors to consider:-

      • Are these cats native (or naturalised) to your local ecosystem? If wherever you live has had cats for a hundred years or so, the local wildlife would have adapted to them. Otherwise, cats can damage the local ecosystem.

      • Do you rely on the cats to suppress vermin (rats, squirrels, small birds, etc.)? Even if your cats aren’t actively killing them, their mere ‘patrolling’ can drive these pests away. But if you keep them indoors, you lose this protection.

      • Are there any local predators that are particularly good at catching cats?

      If your answers are yes, yes and no, then let your cats out. If they are no, no and yes, keep them in as far as possible.

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not really sure how long housecats have been around in this area. I think historically there were a lot of farms here (in the 1800s) so they may have had cats, but I don’t have historical data.

        We didn’t get cats to hunt down mice, but it’s pretty rare that we see them, and it’s an old farmhouse, so maybe we’re relying on their hunting implicitly? I’ve occasionally seen them catch and eat mice around the yard, and sometimes they bring one to the door to show off.

        There are supposedly coyotes around, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen one here, and we’ve only ever had cats just disappear a couple times, and they were already 17-19. The bigger danger seems to be other outdoor cats (not sure if they’re feral or not) that one of ours occasionally fights with, but the vet knows they go outdoors, and they’re up-to-date on all their shots.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Should be fine then.

          but it’s pretty rare that we see them, and it’s an old farmhouse, so maybe we’re relying on their hunting implicitly?

          The presence of your cats is probably keeping the mice away.

          The bigger danger seems to be other outdoor cats

          Cats have their territories and defend them aggressively. Make sure your cats are spayed, but from what I’ve seen even this doesn’t reduce aggression in females.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Afaik, the best is to give them enough space but it should be enclosed. They pose a threat to wildlife to some extent, and some of the wildlife can harm them, besides an obvious possibility of being traumatised or lost.

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s also people with barns who maintain a constantly churning population of cats to keep rodent population down.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not all cats are killing machines but with 3, chances are at least one of them is. On the other hand, an outdoor life is probably much more fulfilling for a cat.

      At a minimum, make sure they have bells around their collar so it warns the local wildlife.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          The bell is annoying the shit out of them, get a reflective/high-visibility collar.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You know, I actually thought about trying to make a product that would have a camera on the cats head and beep aggressively the moment it would detect a bird.

          It’s obviously insane though

    • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s one theory that outdoor cats could be what allows the avian flu to become transmissible to humans which would cause a worldwide pandemic comparable to the black plague in terms of death toll. So there’s that.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you want to give your kitty companion the best shot at a long comfortable life, keep them indoors, it’s as simple as that.
    Leads exist, and so do catios and window boxes if you’re lucky enough to have the space, they can still enjoy the sunshine and fresh air without risk of them getting run over, attacked by another animal/person, getting injured otherwise. I know I just couldn’t bear it if my baby was outside all on her own and got hurt…

    • Shieldtoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      My cats are indoors because I lived next to a cat hater and in a busy street when I got them. Back then I would let them outside on a leash. During the day they were too scared, but they loved investigating the garden in the evening.

      Now I live at a calmer street and have a small walled garden. They love going outside during the day now without a leash. I always stay with them and if they attempt to jump the wall they have to go inside immediately.

      My sisters cats are outdoor cats. They are a lot less affectionate than my cats. My cats greet me when I get home, they like to lay on my lap and they love getting pet. My sisters cats only show up when they’re hungry or when the weather is too bad and will scratch if you pet them longer than 2 seconds.

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m guessing your American? If you try finding a rescue cat for indoors they won’t let you have one. Most cats in the UK and any given by charities are outdoor cats.

      So everyone insisting on one of the other is being very… Annoyingly ignorant!

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        As an American, I have never seen an animal shelter adoption contract that didn’t have a clause about never letting the cat outside. Obviously there are exceptions for leashes and catios, but you get the idea

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s the opposite in the UK where the default is outdoor. So you end up with these very passionate online debates between outdoor vs indoor which are ore due to cultural & geographical differences between countries than any real science.

          So it’s akin to a religious war.

            • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Which is which? Because I’ve seen some show science for keeping cats indoors but I’ve shared two studies based in the UK that show cats are better outdoors. Like I say it’s based on geography too. As some people have pointed out cats have been a wild species in the UK for millenia. So them being outdoors here isn’t an issue.

              Stop being a dick.

              • trolske@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                You can’t compare the impact of actual native wild cats with the impact of domestic cats. It’s such a huge difference in numbers.
                As you said, some areas have wild cats and the ecosystem is tuned to that. But even in those areas the comparable extremely high numbers of additional predators (domesticated cats) is damaging to the wildlife.

                • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The RSPB says outdoor cats aren’t a problem and I linked to a study done by Bristol University in another comment that states they aren’t a problem.

                  Feel free to fuck off and read them and stop talking like your rules are universal across the globe.

      • stufkes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I only know this viewpoint from posters in the US. In Europe I only know the prevailing notion that keeping cats indoors is cruel and they should be outside. Exceptions for large cities ofc but I only know social pressure to get cats out, not keep them in.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess Finland is an exception. Here you’re not supposed to let cats roam free because they could get hurt or die and it would be irresponsible pet ownership. Some still do it ofc.

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not true. I have 2 rescue cats currently indoor only and have had more previously. There’s a few rescues I can think of that look for outdoor homes, and a few who are strictly indoor, but most are quite open minded.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, cats are safer if you never let them go outside, sure.

      So are humans. But would you want to live like that?

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        We don’t let small children cross the street by themselves. That’s because kids have no concept of what a street is, or how dangerous it is. Same for cats, but add in plenty of predators and diseases. Outdoor cats have a much shorter life expectancy than indoor cats.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think the bigger thing than them potentially getting hurt is the fact that they will hunt and decimate local fauna

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          We don’t let small children cross the street by themselves. That’s because kids have no concept of what a street is, or how dangerous it is.

          No, that’s because certain societies are okay with roads being dangerous, and would rather lock their children inside than regulate vehicles.

          (Unless by small children you mean babies, then agreed.)

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          But do they actually get to live though?

          Gilded cage and all that.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yep, that’s my philosophy. Never had a kid age past ten, but they get to live such full lives wandering around the neighborhood until they get run over

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I do live like that.

        Importantly, while cats are safer indoors, vulnerable wildlife is much safer when cats are indoors.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        You running in forests, hunting for food with bare hands, fighting with bears for survival?

      • wellee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s my thought exactly. But they have the mind of a child, so there has to be a middle ground especially if living in a town or busy street. No idea what that could be. If only cats would stay inside the yard, or a cat park like dogs lol.

        But keeping them indoors 100% of the time? Total wrong end of the spectrum, borderline abuse.

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Agreed. All the strays are heartbreaking, they deserve homes!

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Accordingly to my cat (and apparently Sarah Andersen’s), this is a reliable way to give a stray a new home:

        I’m not too eager to trust her biased sampling though.

        [Serious now, we should be more active on that. Also to discourage people from letting cats to “take a walk” unsupervised.]

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Can confirm. Cats always choose you, but sometimes it’s more forcefully. This big boy busted through an open window, used the liter box, and proclaimed himself king.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Depends on if you live on a farm or not*

        It’s not like European outdoor cats don’t murder wildlife and get killed

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t get what this comment is about. Is suburban North America especially dangerous for cats?

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t get what this comment is about. Is suburban North America especially dangerous for cats?

            I suspect that they are meaning that suburban Americans are known for being very opinionated, judgemental, and overly concerned with what others do with their lives.

            However, for your question, if on the peripheries, yes. There is danger to cats from cars but also coyotes, raccoons, and native big cats (bobcats, lynx, and cougars, as well as humans (was terrified for my cat when I lived in a place where serial cat mutilations started taking place). I grew up with outdoor cats but generally have preferred to keep them inside, unless it was not possible (people who think that it’s a case of ignoring a “whiny” cat have obviously never experienced the craftiness and terrorism employed by a feline that grew up semi-feral in the woods).

            My reasoning is very similar to you Finns. I distinctly remember, as a child, finding one of my semi-feral cat friends frozen to death next to a pond in the forest during a particularly cold winter. As a child, we also lost near a dozen cats over the years to wildlife and cat haters in cars intentionally hitting them. That’s just too much.

            I want my cats to live as long and happy a life as possible so, as an adult, when we adopted kittens, we kept them inside. They have windows, toys, and companionship that keeps them from feeling the need to be outdoors.

    • sphfaar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It is not their habitat, from experience I have had many cats, and in my opinion it is better to be able to leave them free so that they can go in and out without going where it needs to be clean.

  • Boingboing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Live in Sweden and have 3 cats. Two are outdoor cats and one wanted to be an outdoor cat but he kinda realised he is fat and lazy and wants to stay home. So this felt very accurate for the cats who live with me!

    Oh and in Sweden all cats are tagged and registered in case any should go missing. I could not imagine a world where I would deny my cats the right to go outside. Then again I did move to the countryside just so my cats could have a better life far away from traffic.

    • dukepontus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cats commit genocide on the avian population. If they would learn to behave they would get outside priviliges.

      • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think humans far outweigh the cats in the scale for harm done to animal populations on this earth.

        Are we gonna really start policing whether or not people let their cats out over some dumb birds?

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The damage done by cats is part of the human related harm. The cats did not relocate of their own volition. We put them there.

          If you think any animal small enough to fit in a cats mouth is “some dumb bird,” then I gotta say Mr. Random Dumb Ape, you sound like you would lose an intelligence test to the bird

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Cats ranking on a nonexistent list of “”“most invasive”“” doesnt matter.

                  Cats degree of invasion is directly controlled by humans. They are, arguably, an extention of us outside of their native ranges.

                  Reducing the impact of cat damage is a direct reduction of human damage. Because the cat was only able to do any damage at all because you let it go outside unsupervised.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well if some dude went around climbing trees, destroying nests and killing the native birds people would probably complain. The harm humans cause is due to their pets too, cats wouldn’t be where they are without humans. When there are too many outdoor cats in an area they breed a lot and effect bird populations which effects other parts of the ecosystem. Idk if it needs to be illegal but if it’s discouraged the numbers of cats killing off birds can be reduced. If people can teach their cats not to eat birds then maybe it would be fine.

        • Eyelessoozeguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel like this line of reasoning works for all pets. Like tigers, who cares about some dumb mammals. Also the damage cats do the ecosystems is part of the harm humans do.