• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    37 minutes ago

    worst case scenario, the usb port is replaceable on most phones without soldering

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I rolled over a brand new cable with my office chair. Now it does this. I’m forcing myself to use it for a year as penance.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Can a steam deck be charged wirelessly? I got a wireless charge pad for my Galaxy S-10e when the charge port started being wonky and it’s worked for a few years now.

      If not, order a new charge port, it shouldn’t be more than $15, and remember to remove your sim card before trying to disassemble the case.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I know that from microUSB but not from USB-C. You have dirt in it? Try to scoop it out with a paperclip.

  • Noah Jorgensen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I hear a lot of people saying to clean the port and I agree. I’ve found with usb c it’s often very difficult to find something thin enough, but I’ve found a staple to be surprisingly good at the job

      • hesdeadjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I use a disposable dental floss pick. The toothpick side is very narrow and no concern scratching too hard down in a port since it is plastic.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s surprising how much pocket fluff gets in there. If it no longer clicks into place, chances are it needs a good clean.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is the one thing that sucks about Apple going USB-C. Lightning is easier to clean for me and my pockets are a lint factory apparently.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I use the ones that add on to an existing cable, that way I’m not bound to one cable type. Snatched like 25 of them when they were $2 on AE.

    • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m having trouble seeing how this works and what difference it offers compared to a regular cable. Don’t you just plug a cable into the port regardless? Sorry for the silly question

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think that the magnetic thing sits constantly in the port, so there’s no risk the charging port gets filled with pocket lint.

        • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Ah, right. Just like those little aux plugs with funny animals attached for phones and stuff but with additional functionality

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You should use the usb until you can’t, wireless charging will burn out your battery and you’ll be in the same place you’re in now, but if your port stops working you’ll have the wireless to fall back on.

      • Clasm@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Keep them clean. There’s no more inherent rush than a regular connector, since the magnetic ones are just the same with a magnet holding them in place instead of friction.

        Also, if they were to break, it’s far easier to replace them instead of the port on the phone. I recommend the ones that are just adapters and not the whole cables though, since they let you use the cables you already own.

          • Clasm@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Nope, far charging works just fine, though you do have to be selective if you want video passthrough, since not all of them have that feature.

            Apple devices also don’t always recognize that the cable is capable and will supposedly limit functionality for the data connection.

  • Fermion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Step 1: clean out the lint from the charging port

    Step 2: make sure you actually got all the lint out and there isn’t any hiding to the side.

    The sim ejector pin that used to come with phones can sometimes just barely fit between the center blade and connector housing. Otherwise a paperclip with a slight hook bent into the end can work well. Flosspicks work well to dig out the lint.

    Also consider getting a wireless charger for nightly charging if your phone supports it.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      I prefer a toothpick. Wood won’t scratch the metal or cause a short, but it’s still stiff enough to scrape any lint that’s stuck. And lint sticks a bit to the toothpick, so that helps get it out.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Neither will the plastic of a floss pick. And the floss pick is narrower so there is much less risk of deforming the interior parts of the plug. Also, less risk of splinters.

      • Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Toothpick is absolutely the best solution for this. 3d printed cleaning picks are also usable but aren’t as strong in my experience

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sometimes the toothpick tapers too quickly though and I have break it or shave a bit off to make it fit all the way into the port

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      The port on my old phone broke entirely but it still had wireless charging so I got three more years out of it. Then the display failed and since phones have switched to USB C I figured it was time to upgrade

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        time to upgrade

        They fucking got ya. That’s like a $30 repair and you just threw it in landfill and gave them another grand or more. Weaksauce.

        • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Given that the phone didn’t have USB-C that most likely means it was from like 2016, so it’s fair to say that it’s time to upgrade. Phones have gotten so much better since then, especially the cameras.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            If the connector hadn’t changed I probably would have gotten it repaired. But since there’s not aftermarket port swaps I figured I should bite the bullet.

            Maybe by 2032 I’ll be ready for a new one again.

        • Albbi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Ouch. Why don’t you remind them that their dog is dead as well. Really lay into them.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Wireless charging WILL wear out your battery faster.

      For longevity, use a slow wired charger. This will put the least thermal strain on the battery.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        How exactly?

        Also, my phone charges slower with a wireless charger.

        Lots of hand wavy theories and generalizations in the answers below, some of them sound very convincing. None of them actually cite any sources or backup those theories with data.

        Here’s my own acedotal experience. I’ve put my phone down on a seemingly well designed wireless charging pad every night for almost 4 years and this phones battery has shown zero sign of deterioration that I can see. This is the first phone I’ve ever owned with wireless charging and also the first with a battery that hasn’t given up the ghost in 2 years or less. The same pad also charges my smart watch every night, which doesn’t even have any other option for charging.

        Next they’ll be telling you to avoid using cruise control on the highway because it will wear out the transmission. Use your phone as it was designed to be used and stop worrying.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          The problem is heat, not charging speed. A wired charger heats the phone less than a wireless charger, and a slow charger heats it less than a fast one.

          It’s not like wireless charging will literally destroy your battery instantly, but it WILL do so faster than wired charging at the same speed.

          You could offset the heat by charging even slower via wireless (easy with something that has a small battery to begin with, like a watch) but no matter what method is used, the one that runs the battery the coolest WILL last the longest, whether the difference is just one year out five, more, or less.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Magnetic charging loses some energy in the form of heat on both coils.

          Technologies like MagSafe lessen the severity of energy loss via ensuring the coils allign, however there is still some energy lost in the form of heat.

          This is just a limitation of electromagnetic induction.

          It’s a producer of heat placed right next to the battery.

          This inefficiency also makes it take more energy to charge your battery. However, I would imagine it’s a nominal amount.

          • Wolf314159@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That’s an interesting theory. I’d like to see some numbers because I really doubt that this heating could be anywhere close to the many other kinds of heat produced through normal phone use. Especially considering that you’re unlikely to be stressing the biggest sources of heat in your phone (the screen and the processor) while it’s sitting in a wireless charging cradle. Also, the charging circuits certainly monitor and adjust for this kind of heat dissipation specifically and are able to control it far better than, for example, the sun hitting the screen or a warm pocket.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              The charging circuit will maintain a “safe” temperature, sure, but using any battery monitor app you like, you can clearly see for yourself that when wireless charging, the phone will sit at a higher temperature during the process, than when wired charging. And every fraction of a degree matters. Not when you use the feature once, but if you do it every day, always charging at a higher temperature, it WILL shorten the lifespan of the battery. The same way every charge does, but to a slightly higher degree for every fraction of a degree in higher temperature.

              The battery does not suffer as much damage from heat when discharging, or when just sitting there, not that that is good for it, either. But every extra bit of thermal strain WHILE charging, causes more damage than if it were running cooler. That’s simply a fact of lithium ion batteries.

            • lobut@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I remember LTT wanting to find out the damage that wireless or fast charging does but found that the way we charge our phones mattered more or something: https://youtu.be/AF2O4l1JprI

              I found the segment and may have summarized it incorrectly but I can’t rewatch the video entirely right now.

            • Franklin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I can only offer you my experience-based evidence, but three magnetic chargers I’ve used have all made my phone significantly hotter then charging it at the equivalent speed with a cable.

              This has been true across 6 Android devices. Two from Google. Four from Samsung. However, I will also say that because of this trend, I stopped using wireless chargers about a year and a half ago, so it’s quite possible they might have improved since then.

              • Wolf314159@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Yes, the tech has gotten a lot better. 6 phones over about 12 years (rough length of time since debut of inductive charging in smartphones) averages to about 2 years per phone. If you weren’t getting the flagship phone each year that lifetime would be shorter. That was comparable to the lifetime of each over my phone’s during that same time, none of which had wireless charging. The phone I have now is the first I’ve had to use inductive charging and it has already lasted twice as long as any of the others and shows now signs of deterioration.

                • Franklin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I typically use my phones for longer than two years. This included both mine and my wife’s devices.

                • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  So your anecdotal evidence trumps everyone elses, as well as actual knowledge of the chemistry involved?

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I don’t know but anecdotally I’ve experienced this with every single phone I’ve had that’s been wireless charging.

          It just shortens its life somehow. I thought I was crazy. It didn’t make sense unless it does fancy shit with the crystals inside or it heats it badly

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Seeing as you’re unhappy with the actual answers, I’m thinking you just wanted to be agreed with.

                • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  Which only states that wireless charging will wear out your battery faster than wired. Not that it’s critically damaging the instant you opt to use it, or that it will shorten the lifespan of a device to nothing.

                  There is a difference, that’s straight up true. One method has the battery sitting at a temperature that is worse for the chemistry involved. That is indisputable. Super fast fast charging that only slows down to keep an already hot battery from becoming dangerous, essentially redlining it for the whole process, has the exact same downsides in terms of thermals, except that wireless charging, being inherently slower for equivalent temperatures, keeps the battery warm for longer.

                  What exactly the difference ends up being, varies from application to application, and from device to device. Obviously, if you lower the charge speed of wireless until it doesn’t heat the battery any more than wired, there wont be a difference, but then you could just do the same for wired charging, and have the battery last even more cycles.

                  Bottom line, whatever option runs the battery the coolest on a given device, WILL CAUSE THE LEAST WEAR. That’s simply true.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I ended up having to use an actual sewing needle since the lint was compacted and the ejector pin was too wide

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      A comment like this one saved me from giving up on my aging phone.

      No matter how convinced you are you definitely cleaned it, there still could be a little bit more stuck in there.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Everyone raves about usb-c but despite my hating everything Apple, the lightning port’s physical design is so much better.

      Who thought putting a thin circuit board projection inside the port was a good idea?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          That’s the signal interface like the number of pins and active termination circuitry.

          Physically there’s no reason for USB c to have a male nub inside a larger female jack and the reverse for the male end. It makes it more fragile and harder to keep clean.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I have had this happen so much more with USB-C than microUSB connectors. I think it’s just a matter of how it locks in place. MicroUsb would very often (though not 100% of the time) have some prong like things on one side that held it in place better.

    USB-C just kinda snaps over a tiny PCB and has room to wiggle around, which, at least in all the devices I’ve had break on me this way, the PCB itself becomes loose or even snaps off from constantly being flexed or jostled around by the cable.

    They should put those little prong/wing things on the top and bottom (in a way that doesn’t mess with the omnidirectional nature of the cable) of the metal oval to lessen this, IMO.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Part of the spec for the USB-C port is to not have any moving/flexing parts because that is like 1000% easier to design waterproof/water resistant portable devices for. So to keep with that, to implement your solution the prongs would have to be on the cable. And in that case it should be pretty doable. There’s nothing stopping someone from designing an improved cable connector and throwing them on a new cable.

    • ovalofsand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Strange… My experience has been the opposite of yours. I’ve actually not had a USB-c cable do this yet.

      • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve had it happen to plenty of USB-C devices, but I had far more issues with previous USB generations.

        Wireless charging tho is clutch as a backup charging method. Key word being backup.

  • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Used to deal with this a lot on my old phone (micro usb) cleaning the port out helped a lot, but it is hard if you don’t have something thin enough to fit in, personally I used ESD tweezers I have on hand for electronics work, but even then I started having to do it once a week to get my phone to charge.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Fewer pouches, but still not zero pouches. This tracks.

      I’m suspicious of those feet though. They look biologically plausible and therefore wrong for the character.

  • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If your port is clean and the cable isn’t messed up, maybe consider replacing the charging port or just get a wireless charger.