• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    My sister once told my mom that empathy is what’s ruining this country. It’s not even like it was a misinterpretation/misunderstanding, that’s almost word for word how she said it. I can’t fathom how someone comes to that line of thinking.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      To me it feels like social darwinism mentality - the belief that helping the weak survive weakens the herd. AKA “hard choices”.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The problem is that’s actually the opposite of how that works. If you refuse to care for the weak in your community, you foster this atmosphere of sociopathy and mistrust that causes the group to destroy itself.

        Why the hell do you think there are only two Sith in Star Wars?

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I can not understand how people can be social darwinist and still support inheritance, even tax free inheritance. If you want just the fittest to survive, everyone needs to start the same. Same education, same situation at home, same connections of the parents. Social darwinist should support that all children are taken from their parents and be brought up in the same orphanages and are given exactly the same tools.

        That said, I can not understand social darwinists at all. Whoever is dumb enough to support this idea is hurting the herd and according to social darwinists…

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          “The rich are passing down superior wealth just as they pass down superior genes.”

          It’s all a crock of shit, but I’ve met people who believe it.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          When I confronted my very Repub dad about the discrepancy between inheritance being okay and giving poor people things for free was bad for them because bootstraps etc, his reaction was “It’s their money, they can give it to whoever they want.”

          But I don’t see why social darwinists would support raising children under identical conditions. A level playing field isn’t part of their creed. They just don’t believe in hampering the superior to take care of the inferior. My dad left me and my sister ample inheritances, and if anything I think he would see that as a sentimental flaw he was entitled to. But if he thought we were the type to blow the money on blackjack and hookers he probably would have donated it to Republicans, thinking that in the long run it was best for us…

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      No thinking was involved. She was repeating something she heard on fascist media.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I can tell you pretty easily but that won’t stop you from pretending to be surprised for internet points next time

      Conservative empathy is reserved only for close associations, it is a crisis management mode that modern doomteller media actively stokes with imaginary threats of immigrants and trans people so it is ALWAYS on

      In times of crisis, humanity’s generosity contracts as we have to do the cold calculations over limited resources and the fact that we do NOT value every person equally.

      Example: If I only had enough food for me and one other person, I would not give that food to a bigot because that food is better served in the belly of a progressive

      It’s just that they are triggered into this mode at all times and their circle of empathy is basically only family and friends, but deep down it is always only just them if times get hard enough

      You saw the same behavior in times of famine all across the world

      • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This happened a while before he came out as a right wing nut job and was embraced by conservatives

        • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          He literally said this two weeks ago. " The death of the West is due to too much empathy." Paraphrased, of course.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Proverbs 14:31 Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God.

    Deuteronomy 15:7 If anyone is poor among your fellow Israelites in any of the towns of the land the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hardhearted or tightfisted toward them.

    Luke 14:13-14 But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.

    Luke 12:15: Then he said, “Beware! Guard against every kind of greed. Life is not measured by how much you own.”

    1 John 4:20 If anyone says, “I love God,” yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen.

    1 John 3:17 But if anyone has the world’s goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God’s love abide in him?

    John 13:34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Matthew 25 (separation of the sheep and the goats) is pretty much the only time Jesus straight-up threatens people with Hell, and he’s basing it on the treatment of the poor, sick, and social outcasts.

      • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Warning to Rich Oppressors

        5 Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you. 2 Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. 3 Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. 4 Look! The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. 5 You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter.[a] 6 You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you.

        https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5&version=NIV

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.

      Imagine if they just threw away the whole fucking book before this, we would have a better world.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Turns out you can fit pretty much the entirety of Christian morality inside of a fortune cookie and the rest is just window dressing.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

    16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

    17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

    18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

    19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

    20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Republicans would be very upset with you using the bible against them, if they had ever read the bible to know what it said.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The usual response is “you only know a few cherry picked quotes, and would burst into flames if you actually read the whole thing” blah blah blah.

        • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The next usual response is “Oh, I appreciate the warning from when you gave it a go.”

          I get so tired of faith being used to hurt.

        • tikifire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I could say “I read it all years ago, have you?”. Grew up in an evangelical church that encouraged us to read it surprisingly.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      https://archive.org/stream/god-the-original-segregationist-by-carey-l.-daniel/God the Original Segregationist by Carey L. Daniel_djvu.txt

      **But if God intended that the Negro race should be Segregated in Africa then why did He curse the children of Ham and decree that they should be the servants, or slaves, ot the other races?’’

      God did not. Canaan was the only one specifically cursed to be a ‘‘servant of servants’’ (Genesis 9:20-27). Even if we admit the possibility that all his descendants were included in the curse (the best Bible scholars disagree on this point). we must still remember that Canaan was only one of the four sons of Ham and therefore he fathered only a MINORITY of the black race. And as I said before, even that servile minority were to live in a different part of the country from the Hebrews (Genesis 10:19).

      It cannot be positively proven from the Scriptures that the Negroes were cursed to be black because of Nimrod’s rebellion or because of Ham’s sexual laxity at the time of his father Noah’s drunkenness. But there are some verses that seem to leave that implication. For example in Jeremiah 13:23 we read, ‘*Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.’’ Here the black Skin of the Negro is obviously a symbol of evil. This verse also shows that God meant for that skin to STAY BLACK and not be blended into a Thousand shades of mulatto.

      The notion that the Negroes of this country have INHERITED the “‘deep Sunburn’’ that their forefathers are said to have suffered in Africa is ridiculous. Sunburns are not inherited, no matter how deeply they penetrate, not even by the first generation, not to mention the tenth or twelfth generation.

      If we are to reject the curse of Ham and the rebellious leadership of Nimrod as explanations of why God made the‘Negro black then there is only one other possible explanation to be found anywhere in the Bible or out of it: THE GOOD LORD WAS SO ANXIOUS FOR THE HAMITES TO BE SEPARATED AND SEG- REGATED PEOPLE THAT HE MADE THEM RADICALLY DIFFERENT IN THEIR APPEARANCE FROM THE PEOPLE OF ALL OTHER RACES. He made their skin color different for for the same reason that He made their language different and for the same reason that He assigned them a different habitation… At least we would be much kinder and more charitable to our colored friends if we gave that explanation.

      The southern Bible doesn’t read like yours and mine does, they made some notes in the margins.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Empathy is the enemy of the the manipulative. Their shallow and transparent manipulations wont get past someone with even a small amount of it.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      True for some. Others specifically exploit your empathy by centering it on themselves, red herrings, or subverting the action it motivates.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This isn’t really new though, it’s just saying the quite part out loud. always-has-been.gif.

    Neoliberalism is the cause of the decay and paved the way for fascism. If you let large conglomerates own everything including news media and social media and then sell access to spew vile hate speech and disinformation to people, the current result is to be expected. It’s actually kind of refreshing that they actually come out and say it.

    These people also don’t believe in equality, they believe inequality of humans is fundamentally morally correct. Neoliberals believe in inequality based on class/wealth, fascists believe in inequality based on identity like race or gender.

    The true sin is ignorance and neglect.

  • Trees@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    With flattery he will corrupt those who have violated the covenant, but the people who know their God will firmly resist him.

    Daniel 11:32

    He will cause deceit to prosper, and he will consider himself superior… He will use every kind of evil deception to fool those on their way to destruction, because they refuse to love and accept the truth that would save them.

    Daniel 8:25, 2 Thess 2:10

    … a despicable person will arise… a man of contempt… to whom the royal honor has not been rightfully conferred. He will slip in when least expected and will seize the kingdom through flattery and intrigue.

    Daniel 11:21

    After an alliance is made with him he will practice deception, and he will go up and gain power with a small force of people.

    Daniel 11:23

    He will try to change the set times and the laws.

    Dan. 7:25

      • igg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That is just Daniel 8. Daniel 11 could reasonably be talking about modern times

          • Fluke@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Which is why some people still hold it up as a valuable text. It’s a well written book of scams to keep the ignorant masses in line.

            It is, in essence, a compilation of the vague shite that “fortune tellers” spew to the marks looking to be told what they want to hear.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Not really, from context pretty sure it’s one of those “ex post facto” prophecy things.

          This is why people should read books of the Bible and not verse. Random bits out of context are used to imply so much BS.

          Now then, I tell you the truth: Three more kings will arise in Persia, and then a fourth, who will be far richer than all the others. When he has gained power by his wealth, he will stir up everyone against the kingdom of Greece. Then a mighty king will arise, who will rule with great power and do as he pleases. After he has arisen, his empire will be broken up and parceled out toward the four winds of heaven. It will not go to his descendants, nor will it have the power he exercised, because his empire will be uprooted and given to others.

          The king of the South will become strong, but one of his commanders will become even stronger than he and will rule his own kingdom with great power. After some years, they will become allies. The daughter of the king of the South will go to the king of the North to make an alliance, but she will not retain her power, and he and his power will not last. In those days she will be betrayed, together with her royal escort and her father[ and the one who supported her.

          One from her family line will arise to take her place. He will attack the forces of the king of the North and enter his fortress; he will fight against them and be victorious. He will also seize their gods, their metal images and their valuable articles of silver and gold and carry them off to Egypt. For some years he will leave the king of the North alone. Then the king of the North will invade the realm of the king of the South but will retreat to his own country. His sons will prepare for war and assemble a great army, which will sweep on like an irresistible flood and carry the battle as far as his fortress.

          None of this is connected to Revelation, which was written centuries later.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Cowards fear empathy and maim their own capacity for it, because experiencing the pain of others hurts. Being surrounded by extreme, intolerable pain is the most difficult part of being vegan.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      There’s an argument going around evangelical circles that “empathy” is more dangerous than compassion, with the analogy of jumping in to save someone in quicksand, but getting stuck yourself (empathy) vs throwing someone a rope and keeping your footing (compassion). Like if you understand a bad person’s thinking too much, you are dragged into their sin.

      There’s even a tinge of women being more empathetic and “susceptible” than men.

      It’s how it sounds.

      Dig into the argument, and they all eventually end up focusing on dangerous progressive causes as tempting Christians, basically, and it feels like they’re trying to twist scripture into current MAGA doctrine. JD Vance (a Catholic, not evangelical IIRC) said something related on immigration, that loving your family and those close to you comes before loving distant neighbors, which the Pope very pointedly refuted.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, glad to see the specific instance but after trying to search I see this seems to be a broader doctrine. That you would absolutely hate people who “deserve” to be hated, accordingly to the viewpoint of whoever is preaching regardless of whether that person’s situation actually affects anyone other than themselves.

        It’s kind of like the evil twin of “be tolerant, except of intolerance”: “be tolerant only of intolerance”

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I find it more than a little humorous that their defining attribute for the last hundred years is so easily abandoned